as a award recipient?
<--- Score
25. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
26. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
27. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
28. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
29. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
30. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
31. Have you identified your Message Queuing as a Service key performance indicators?
<--- Score
32. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
33. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
34. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
35. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
36. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
37. What Message Queuing as a Service coordination do you need?
<--- Score
38. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
39. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Message Queuing as a Service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
40. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
41. Which information does the Message Queuing as a Service business case need to include?
<--- Score
42. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
43. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
44. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
45. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
46. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
47. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
48. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
49. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
50. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
51. What vendors make products that address the Message Queuing as a Service needs?
<--- Score
52. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
53. Who should resolve the Message Queuing as a Service issues?
<--- Score
54. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
55. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
56. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
57. What are the Message Queuing as a Service resources needed?
<--- Score
58. Consider your own Message Queuing as a Service project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
59. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
60. Are there Message Queuing as a Service problems defined?
<--- Score
61. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
62. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Message Queuing as a Service project?
<--- Score
63. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
64. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
65. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
66. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
67. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
68. Do you recognize Message Queuing as a Service achievements?
<--- Score
69.
