Procurement Management Plan: Message Queuing As A Service213
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Message Queuing As A Service215
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Message Queuing As A Service217
2.39 Change Management Plan: Message Queuing As A Service219
3.0 Executing Process Group: Message Queuing As A Service221
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Message Queuing As A Service223
3.2 Change Request: Message Queuing As A Service225
3.3 Change Log: Message Queuing As A Service227
3.4 Decision Log: Message Queuing As A Service229
3.5 Quality Audit: Message Queuing As A Service231
3.6 Team Directory: Message Queuing As A Service234
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Message Queuing As A Service236
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Message Queuing As A Service238
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Message Queuing As A Service240
3.10 Issue Log: Message Queuing As A Service242
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Message Queuing As A Service244
4.1 Project Performance Report: Message Queuing As A Service246
4.2 Variance Analysis: Message Queuing As A Service248
4.3 Earned Value Status: Message Queuing As A Service250
4.4 Risk Audit: Message Queuing As A Service252
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Message Queuing As A Service254
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Message Queuing As A Service256
5.0 Closing Process Group: Message Queuing As A Service258
5.1 Procurement Audit: Message Queuing As A Service260
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Message Queuing As A Service262
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Message Queuing As A Service264
5.4 Lessons Learned: Message Queuing As A Service266
Index268
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you assess your Message Queuing as a Service workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
2. For your Message Queuing as a Service project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
3. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
4. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
5. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
6. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Message Queuing as a Service research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
7. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
8. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
9. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Message Queuing as a Service? In other words, what are the risks, if Message Queuing as a Service does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
10. What Message Queuing as a Service events should you attend?
<--- Score
11. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Message Queuing as a Service delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
12. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
13. What situation(s) led to this Message Queuing as a Service Self Assessment?
<--- Score
14. Who needs to know about Message Queuing as a Service?
<--- Score
15. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
16. Is it needed?
<--- Score
17. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
18. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
19. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
20. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
21. What Message Queuing as a Service problem should be solved?
<--- Score
22. What would happen if Message Queuing as a Service weren’t done?
<--- Score
23. How are the Message Queuing as a Service’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
24. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized
