are available to the team?
<--- Score
57. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
58. Is Environmental enterprise required?
<--- Score
59. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
60. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
62. Who approved the Environmental enterprise scope?
<--- Score
63. What is the scope of the Environmental enterprise effort?
<--- Score
64. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
65. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
66. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
67. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
68. What is the context?
<--- Score
69. What are the core elements of the Environmental enterprise business case?
<--- Score
70. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
71. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
72. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
73. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
74. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
75. What system do you use for gathering Environmental enterprise information?
<--- Score
76. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
77. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
78. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
79. How are consistent Environmental enterprise definitions important?
<--- Score
80. Has a Environmental enterprise requirement not been met?
<--- Score
81. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental enterprise changes?
<--- Score
82. Will a Environmental enterprise production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
83. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental enterprise results are met?
<--- Score
84. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
85. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
86. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
87. How do you hand over Environmental enterprise context?
<--- Score
88. Who are the Environmental enterprise improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
89. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
90. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
91. How do you gather Environmental enterprise requirements?
<--- Score
92. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
93. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental enterprise results?
<--- Score
95. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental enterprise? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
96. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
97. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental enterprise?
<--- Score
98. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental enterprise goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
99. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
100.
