be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
7. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
8. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
9. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
10. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
11. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
12. How have you defined all Community health services requirements first?
<--- Score
13. What are the Community health services tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
14. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
15. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Community health services results are met?
<--- Score
16. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
17. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
18. What Community health services requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
19. Are accountability and ownership for Community health services clearly defined?
<--- Score
20. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
21. Has a Community health services requirement not been met?
<--- Score
22. Is the Community health services scope manageable?
<--- Score
23. How do you catch Community health services definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
24. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
25. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
26. What was the context?
<--- Score
27. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
28. What sources do you use to gather information for a Community health services study?
<--- Score
29. What is in scope?
<--- Score
30. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
31. What are the record-keeping requirements of Community health services activities?
<--- Score
32. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
33. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Community health services? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
34. How can the value of Community health services be defined?
<--- Score
35. What is the context?
<--- Score
36. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
37. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
38. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
39. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
40. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
41. Is Community health services required?
<--- Score
42. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
43. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
44. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
45. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
46. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
47. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
48. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
49. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Community health services work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
50. Is there a critical path to deliver Community health services results?
<--- Score
51.
