Information Loss A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Information Loss A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 5
77. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
78. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
79. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Information loss?
<--- Score
80. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
81. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
82. Will Information loss deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
83. Think about the people you identified for your Information loss project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
84. Do you recognize Information loss achievements?
<--- Score
85. What Information loss capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
86. Consider your own Information loss project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
87. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
88. Are there Information loss problems defined?
<--- Score
89. How do you recognize an Information loss objection?
<--- Score
90. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Information loss will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
91. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
92. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Information loss? In other words, what are the risks, if Information loss does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
93. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information loss Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
2. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
3. Are the Information loss requirements complete?
<--- Score
4. What is the definition of Information loss excellence?
<--- Score
5. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information loss leverage and how?
<--- Score
6. Is the Information loss scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
7. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
8. What system do you use for gathering Information loss information?
<--- Score
9. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
10. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
11. How do you manage changes in Information loss requirements?
<--- Score
12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
13. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
14. What was the context?
<--- Score
15. Are improvement team members fully trained on Information loss?
<--- Score
16. How do you gather Information loss requirements?
<--- Score
17. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
18. Is there a clear Information loss case definition?
<--- Score
19. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
20. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
21. Is Information loss required?
<---