<--- Score
16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
17. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
18. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information criteria results are met?
<--- Score
19. How do you hand over Information criteria context?
<--- Score
20. What are the Information criteria use cases?
<--- Score
21. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
22. Has a Information criteria requirement not been met?
<--- Score
23. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
24. How do you think the partners involved in Information criteria would have defined success?
<--- Score
25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
26. Is there any additional Information criteria definition of success?
<--- Score
27. How did the Information criteria manager receive input to the development of a Information criteria improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
28. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
29. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information criteria leverage and how?
<--- Score
30. Do you have a Information criteria success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
31. How would you define Information criteria leadership?
<--- Score
32. Is there a critical path to deliver Information criteria results?
<--- Score
33. What would be the goal or target for a Information criteria’s improvement team?
<--- Score
34. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information criteria activities?
<--- Score
35. Is Information criteria linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
36. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information criteria? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
37. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. Do you all define Information criteria in the same way?
<--- Score
39. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
40. What is the definition of Information criteria excellence?
<--- Score
41. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
42. Why are you doing Information criteria and what is the scope?
<--- Score
43. When is/was the Information criteria start date?
<--- Score
44. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information criteria?
<--- Score
45. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
46. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
47. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
48. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
49. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
50. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
51. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
52. How do you manage changes in Information criteria requirements?
<--- Score
53. What is the context?
<--- Score
54. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
55. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
56. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
57. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
58. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information criteria study?
<---
