Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. Lynne Shore Garcia

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Diagnostic Medical Parasitology - Lynne Shore Garcia страница 22

Diagnostic Medical Parasitology - Lynne Shore Garcia

Скачать книгу

to ensure proper delivery. Also, remember that if you use an overnight carrier, the address must also contain a street address, not just a P.O. Box or general address such as department and institution.

      The Shipper’s Declaration for Dangerous Goods is a legal document that serves as a contract between the shipper and carrier; it must be accurate and legible and have no spelling errors. However, if minor discrepancies in typing or punctuation are present, they are no longer considered errors if they do not compromise safety. The document must be either handwritten by one person or typed. Two copies of the Shipper’s Declaration must be completed and signed for each shipment. One copy is retained by the shipper, and the other is forwarded with the package; one copy can be a carbon copy. This document is required for shipping infectious substances and toxic substances; it is not required for shipping diagnostic specimens or biological products. If there are no dangerous goods in a shipment with dry ice, the Shipper’s Declaration is not required. It is important for personnel within the laboratory to thoroughly understand these regulations and to have sample copies of appropriate documentation for referral. A checklist used by carriers to decide to accept or reject a package is widely used; a copy of this document should also be on file within the laboratory.

      The current editions of the Code of Federal Regulations can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. Inquiries about Postal Service publications may be directed to U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza, Washington, DC 20260-5365. Dangerous Goods Regulations can be obtained from Publications Assistant, International Air Transport Association, 2000 Peel Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2R4.

      References

      6. Garcia LS, Voge M. 1980. Diagnostic clinical parasitology. I. Proper specimen collection and processing. Am J Med Technol 46:459–467. PMID 6155783

      8. Chan RJ, Chen J, York MK, Setijono N, Kaplan RL, Graham F, Tanowitz HB. 2000. Evaluation of a combination rapid immunoassay for detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium antigens. J Clin Microbiol 38:393–394. PMID 10618122

      9. Church D, Miller K, Lichtenfeld A, Semeniuk H, Kirkham B, Laupland K, Elsayed S. 2005. Screening for Giardia/Cryptosporidium infections using an enzyme immunoassay in a centralized regional microbiology laboratory. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129:754–759. PMID 15913423

      10. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY. 1997. Evaluation of nine immunoassay kits (enzyme immunoassay and direct fluorescence) for detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum in human fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 35:1526–1529. PMID 9163474

      12. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY. 1999. Detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum antigens in human fecal specimens using the ColorPAC combination rapid solid-phase qualitative immunochromatographic assay. J Clin Microbiol 38:1267–1268. PMID 10699038

      13. Garcia LS, Shimizu RY, Bernard CN. 2000. Detection of Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica/E dispar, and Cryptosporidium parvum antigens in human fecal specimens using the EIA triage parasite panel enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 38:3337–3340. PMID 10970380

      14. Haque R, Ali IKM, Akther S, Petri WA. 1998. Comparison of PCR, isoenzyme analysis, and antigen detection for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection. J Clin Microbiol 36:449–452. PMID 9466756

      15. Isenberg HD (ed). 2004. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

      17. Lincicome DR. 1942. Fluctuation in numbers of cysts of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba coli in the stools of rhesus monkeys. Am J Hyg 36:321–337.

      18. Melvin DM, Brooke MM. 1982. Laboratory Procedures for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasites, 3rd ed. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (CDC) 82–8282. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

      19. Sawitz WG, Faust EC. 1942. The probability of detecting intestinal protozoa by successive stool examinations. Am J Trop Med 22:131–136.

Скачать книгу