The 2017 FIDIC Contracts. William Godwin
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу The 2017 FIDIC Contracts - William Godwin страница 8
Employer design
The main distinguishing feature of the 1999 Red Book is that the Employer is responsible for all or most of the design of the works. The title of the 1999 edition (and the 2017) is Conditions of Contract for Construction, for Building and Engineering Works designed by the Employer. That is not to say the Contractor is never responsible for any design, but the form is intended for use where the Employer or those acting on his behalf are responsible for all or most of the design. The Contractor's basic responsibility under the Red Book forms is to execute the works in accordance with designs prepared by or on behalf of the Employer.
Re‐measurement
The second main distinguishing feature of the 1999 Red Book is that it is a re‐measurement contract. The Contractor's entitlement is to be paid in accordance with the quantity of work he executes under the Contract applying the relevant rates, typically stated in the bills of quantities. This is by contrast with the other two members of the rainbow suite, the Yellow and Silver Books, where the Contractor's basic entitlement is to be paid a fixed price lump sum subject to adjustments or additions for such things as variations.
The Engineer
The third feature of the Red Book, which it shares with the Yellow Book, is that an important role is assigned to the Engineer. Under both Books in both the 1999 and 2017 editions the Employer is obliged to appoint an Engineer to administer the Contract. The Engineer is not a party to the Contract, but he exercises a range of important functions which control the project and affect the rights of the two parties, the Employer and Contractor. Broadly speaking, those functions involve administering the Contract, by for example certifying interim payments due to the Contractor, and determining certain matters affecting the parties' entitlements under the Contract, such as the Contractor's entitlement to an extension of time or an additional payment.
This latter adjudicative function in particular highlights the dual role Engineers perform of being at once the agents of the Employer for various purposes and determiners of the parties' entitlements. Engineers' decisions about such matters as extensions of time or additional payments are not in general final under the FIDIC forms, although, as we shall see, if time limits are breached an Engineer's determination might become final; but the importance of ensuring that as far as possible the Engineer, in making his determinations, should do so in a disinterested and fair way as between the parties has led to express provision in both the 1999 and 2017 editions of the Red and Yellow forms for the Engineer to act fairly, in accordance with the Contract and taking into account all relevant circumstances (clause 3.5/1999 and 3.7/2017) with, in the 2017 editions of the two Books, the express additional requirement that the Engineer should act neutrally between the parties and not be deemed to act for the Employer (clause 3.7 of the 2017 editions). The 2017 editions also provide (clause 3.2) that there should be no requirement for the Engineer to obtain the Employer's consent before exercising his authority under clause 3.7.
The role of the Engineer in the 2017 editions of the Red and Yellow Books is another legacy of the UK origins of the FIDIC forms. The UK domestic engineering forms historically assigned an important role to the Engineer, broadly in line with the role adopted by the Engineer in the FIDIC Books; and historically the Engineer was treated as a professional person to be accorded great respect, and who was expected by both parties to act neutrally and fairly in carrying out all his functions. This traditional status of the Engineer has for some time been eroded, and in many cases in projects internationally he has come to be regarded as no more than the mouthpiece of the Employer. For that reason the 2017 editions have sought to reinforce the expected neutrality of the Engineer by the new provisions in clauses 3.2 and 3.7.
Risk allocation
The fourth feature of the 1999 Red Book, which it also shares with the 1999 Yellow Book, is that the allocation of risk between Contractor and Employer is intended to be an even handed or fair one, having regard to each party's ability to manage and control risk. Thus, for example, under clause 4.12 of both Books the Contractor may claim both additional time and money if he encounters physical conditions which were unforeseeable in the sense that they were not reasonably foreseeable by an experienced contractor at the date of tender, or the Base Date1 in the 2017 editions.2The Contract allocates risk by striking a balance between the need to protect the Employer from the time and cost consequences of physical conditions which an experienced Contractor ought to have foreseen, and the need to protect responsible contractors from the time and cost consequences of conditions which they cannot reasonably have been expected to foresee at tender stage.
The reputation which FIDIC has traditionally enjoyed of fairly allocating risk between the parties largely derives from this approach, reflected not merely in the 1999 edition of the Red Book but in its predecessors and in the Yellow Book (to which we turn below) and its forebears; and the same can be said of the 2017 editions of the two Books.
The scope for claims under the Red and Yellow Books in both editions is considerable by comparison with the third member of the 1999 rainbow suite, the Silver Book, considered in Section 1.2.3 below.
1.2.2 The 1999 Yellow Book
The Yellow Book is the second oldest member of the 1999 FIDIC suite of contracts. Its origins go back to an electrical and mechanical form of contract, the Electrical and Mechanical Yellow Book, first published in 1963. In contracts for electrical and mechanical works much of the design is carried out off‐site and installation carried out by specialist contractors. In this type of contract it makes more sense for the contractor rather than the employer to be primarily responsible for design. The 1963 Yellow Book was therefore a contractor‐design form of contract under which the Contractor and not the Employer was responsible for all or most of the design.
The Yellow Book underwent various editions, culminating in the third edition in 1987, the same year as the fourth edition of the FIDIC Red Book. When preparing the 1999 Yellow Book the task group mainly had regard to the 1987 version of the Yellow Book, and also to another form, first published in 1995, called Conditions of Contract for Design‐Build and Turnkey; this was known as the Orange Book.
The Orange Book was introduced to accommodate the growing trend for projects to be procured on a design‐build or ‘turnkey’ basis. Its scope was wider than the 1987 Yellow Book because it was not a specifically electrical and mechanical form of contract. Among the distinctive features of the Orange Book was a departure from the use of the Engineer. In the Orange Book there was no Engineer but the Employer administered the Contract. He was not intended to be neutral although when making determinations had still to act fairly, reasonably and in accordance with the Contract. A second significant feature of the Orange Book was that it introduced an independent dispute adjudication board, called the DAB, considered below in Chapter 16.
The 1999 Yellow Book replaced both the Yellow Book 1987 and the 1995 Orange Book. Whereas the 1987 Yellow Book dealt only with electrical and mechanical works,