Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. Ashok Das

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Lectures on Quantum Field Theory - Ashok Das страница 26

Автор:
Жанр:
Серия:
Издательство:
Lectures on Quantum Field Theory - Ashok Das

Скачать книгу

rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_ab5ee148-79ad-5740-9fde-74f2d2c416df">3.112) or (3.113) can now be written as

image

      Let us consider the free Dirac equation for a massive spin image particle,

image

      where we are not assuming any relation between p0 and p as yet. Let us represent the four component spinor (as before) as

image

      where u1(p) and u2(p) are two component spinors. In terms of u1(p) and u2(p), the Dirac equation takes the form

image

      Explicitly, this leads to the two (2-component) coupled equations

image

      which can also be written as

      Taking the sum and the difference of the two equations in (3.132), we obtain

      We note that if we define two new (2-component) spinors as

image

      then, the equations in (3.133) can be rewritten as a set of two coupled (2-component) spinor equations of the form

      This shows that it is the mass term which couples the two equations.

      Let us note that in the limit m → 0, the two equations in (3.135) reduce to two (2-component) spinor equations which are decoupled and have the simpler forms

image

      These two equations, like the Dirac equation, can be shown to be covariant under proper Lorentz transformations (as they should be, since vanishing of the mass which is a Lorentz scalar should not change the behavior of the equation under proper Lorentz transformations). These equations, however, are not invariant under parity or space reflection and are known as the Weyl equations. The corresponding two component spinors uL and uR are also known as Weyl spinors.

      Let us note that, in the massless limit,

image

      Similarly, we can show that uL(p) also satisfies

image

      Thus, for a nontrivial solution of these equations to exist, we must have

image

      which is the Einstein relation for a massless particle. It is clear, therefore, that for such solutions, we must have

image

      For p0 = |p|, namely, for the positive energy solutions, we note that

image

      while

image

      In other words, the two different Weyl equations really describe particles with opposite helicity. Recalling that imageσ denotes the spin operator for a two component spinor, we note that uL(p) describes a particle with helicity image or a particle with spin anti-parallel to its direction of motion. If we think of spin as arising from a circular motion, then we conclude that for such a particle, the circular motion would correspond to that of a left-handed screw. Correspondingly, such a particle is called a left-handed particle (which is the reason for the subscript L). On the other hand, uR(p) describes a particle with helicity image or a particle with spin parallel to its direction of motion. Such a particle is known as a right-handed particle since its spin motion would correspond to that of a right-handed screw. This is shown in Fig. 3.1 and we note here that this nomenclature is opposite of what is commonly used in optics. (Handedness is also referred to as chirality and these (4 component Dirac) spinors can be shown to be eigenstates of the γ5 matrix which can also be understood more easily from the chiral symmetry associated with massless Dirac systems.)

image

      As we know, the electron neutrino emitted in a beta decay

image

      is massless (present experiments suggest they are almost massless) and, therefore, can be described by a two component Weyl equation. We also know, experimentally, that νe is left-handed, namely, its helicity is image In the hole theoretic language, then, the absence of a negative energy neutrino would appear as a “hole” with the momentum reversed. Therefore, the anti-neutrino, in this description, will have opposite helicity or will be right-handed. Alternatively, the neutrino is left-handed and hence satisfies the equation

image

      and has negative helicity. It is helicity which is the conserved quantum number and, hence, the absence of a negative energy neutrino would appear as a “hole” with opposite helicity. That the anti-neutrino is right-handed is, of course, observed in experiments such as

image

Скачать книгу