Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory. Vassily Olegovich Manturov
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory - Vassily Olegovich Manturov страница 13
To prove the inverse implication, consider an unoriented diagram
First, note that if this relation holds for one resolution of the word
But by definition the diagram
1.2Small cancellation theory
1.2.1Small cancellation conditions
We will introduce the notion of small cancellation conditions C′(λ), C(p) and T(q). Roughly speaking, the conditions C′(λ) and C(p) mean that if one takes a free product of two relations, one gets “not too many” cancellations. To give exact definition of those objects, we need to define symmetrisation and a piece.
As before, let G be a group with a presentation (1.1). Given a set of relations
Definition 1.7. Let λ be a positive real number. A set of relations
for every r ∈
Definition 1.8. Let p be a natural number. A set of relations
The small cancellation conditions are given as conditions on the set of relations
The condition C′(λ) is sometimes called metric and the condition C(p) — non-metric. Note that
There exists one more small cancellation condition. Usually it is used together with either of the conditions C′(λ) or C(p).
Definition 1.9. Let q be a natural number, q > 2. A set of relations
Remark 1.1. Those conditions have a very natural geometric interpretation in terms of van Kampen diagrams. Namely, the C(p) condition means that every interior cell of the corresponding disc partitioning has at least p sides; the T(q) condition means that every interior vertex of the partitioning has the degree of at least q.
Note that every set
1.2.2The Greendlinger theorem
An important problem of combinatorial group theory is the word problem: the question whether for a given word W in a group G holds the equality W =1 (or, more generally, whether two given words are equal in a given group). Usually the difficult question is to construct a group where a certain set of relations holds but a given word is nontrivial. In other words, to prove that a set of relations