Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory. Vassily Olegovich Manturov
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory - Vassily Olegovich Manturov страница 21
![Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory - Vassily Olegovich Manturov Invariants And Pictures: Low-dimensional Topology And Combinatorial Group Theory - Vassily Olegovich Manturov Series On Knots And Everything](/cover_pre875455.jpg)
Definition 2.13. An n-system is a set of elements e1 ∈ E1, . . . , en, ∈ En;
An ordered n-system is an n-system together with a permutation from Sn.
Proposition 2.1. There exists an injective map from equivalence classes of admissible systems of curves to ordered n-systems.
Proof. Since the permutation for equivalent admissible systems of curves is the same, we can fix the permutation s ∈ Sn and consider only equivalence classes of admissible systems of curves with permutation s (i.e., with all lower points fixed depending on the upper points in accordance with s). Thus we only have to show that there exists an injective map from the set of admissible systems of n curves with fixed lower points to n-systems.
To complete the proof of the proposition, it suffices to prove the following.
Lemma 2.4. Equivalence classes of curves with fixed points (i, 1) and (j, 0) are in one-to-one correspondence with Ei.
Proof. Denote
If we deform ρ outside C, then we obtain a continuous deformation of the loop, thus W(ρ) stays the same as an element of the fundamental group. The deformations of ρ inside C might change W(ρ) by multiplying it by ai on the left side. So, we have constructed a map from equivalence classes of curves with fixed points (i, 1) and (j, 0) to Ei.
The inverse map can be easily constructed as follows. Let W be an element of π1(Pn, X). Consider a loop L representing W. Now consider the curve L′ that first goes from (i, 1) to X vertically, then goes along L′, after this goes vertically downwards until (i, 0) and finally, horizontally until (j, 0). Obviously, W(L′) = W. It is easy to see that for different representatives L of W we obtain the same L′. Besides, for L1 = aiL2, the curves
Thus, for a fixed permutation s, admissible systems of curves can be uniquely encoded by n-systems, which completes the proof of the proposition.
Now, we see that this invariant is a quite simple object: elements of Ei can be easily compared.
Let us describe the algebraic construction of the invariant f in more detail.
Let β be a braid word, written as a product of generators
We are going to construct the n-system step-by-step while writing the word β. First, let us write n empty words (in the alphabet a1, . . . , an). Let the first letter of β be σj. Then all words except for the word ej+1 should stay the same (i.e., empty), and the word ej+1 becomes
Example 2.1. For the trivial braid written as
A priori these words may be non-trivial; they must only represent trivial residue classes, say,
However, it is not the case.
Proposition 2.2. For the trivial braid, the algebraic algorithm described above gives trivial words.
Proof. Indeed, the algebraic number of occurrences of ai in the word ei equals zero. This can be easily proved by induction on the number of crossings. In the initial position all words are trivial. The induction step is obvious. Thus, the final word ei equals
From this approach, one can easily obtain the well known invariant (action) as follows. Instead of a set of n words e1, . . . , en, one can consider the words