Honey Bee Medicine for the Veterinary Practitioner. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Honey Bee Medicine for the Veterinary Practitioner - Группа авторов страница 23
Goal 4: Select Quality Queens and Let the Bees Requeen!
A vigorously laying queen is the most efficient promoter of good genes, so it is of utmost importance to keep colonies headed by highly fertile queens. If a hive must be requeened, it is better to allow the bees to choose their new queen (if age‐appropriate larvae are present) than to replace her artificially since it has been shown that when bees are confronted with an emergency need for queen rearing, they do not select larvae at random for their queen cells (as a beekeeper might), but instead select larvae of certain patrilines (Moritz et al. 2005). In the future, beekeepers and bee doctors may be able to better assess queen quality through quantitative means; queen quality, judged in terms of body weight, is a good predictor of a queen's mating flight number, ovarian size, and overall mating success (Amiri et al. 2017).
Although insects lack the immunological memory provided by the antibodies of vertebrates, queen bees can recognize specific pathogens and prime their offspring against them (Salmela et al. 2015). The queen passes these immune signals to her future offspring via the egg‐yolk vitellogenin, a protein that has been shown to bind harmful bacteria, including the P. larvae of American foulbrood. Queens of local origin will pass onto their larva the essential immune cells that are adapted to the pathogens she has encountered in her environment, giving her offspring the chance to build defenses against disease agents before they (the bees) emerge and become exposed to pathogens in the nest.
Promoting Good Lifestyle
The ways in which honey bee colonies live in the wild differ substantially from those experienced by colonies living in apiaries, where they are managed by beekeepers for honey production or crop pollination. Although there is debate about whether honey bees are truly domesticated (modified genetically to be more useful to humans), it is certain that humans have changed their living conditions through a variety of means. Just as domestic animals are manipulated by farmers in their housing, feed, and even medical care, so too are the colonies of honey bees that are managed by beekeepers. We suggest the following goals to help improve colony fitness through alterations of honey bee lifestyle.
Goal 1: Boost Rather than Disrupt Social Immunity of the Superorganism
In the next chapter we will learn that a honey bee colony is a superorganism. In other words, it is a highly integrated unit of function that has been shaped by natural selection to function as an integrated whole. One result of this high level of organization is that the immune system of a worker honey bee is relatively simple compared to those of non‐social bees. With this in mind, we should note that there the beekeeper and bee doctor can inadvertantly weaken the social immunity of the colony. Perhaps the most damaging is breaking and reducing the propolis envelope, which will impair the colony's social immunity and compromise honey bee health. Therefore, the number of times a hive is opened for inspections or manipulations should be reduced to a minimum. The layers of propolis lining the walls and inner cover are playing an important role and should be left intact. The beekeeper can stimulate his/her bees living in a hive to build a complete propolis envelope by using hives whose inner walls have been roughened or by lining the interior surfaces with propolis collection screens.
Goal 2: Quarantine from Pests and Pathogens
Bee doctors should work closely with beekeepers to avoid bringing honey bee colonies from an outside location into an established apiary. The most important drivers of honey bee die‐offs in North America have all been caused by emerging pests and pathogens that came from other parts of the world – Varroa mites from Asia, small hive beetles from Africa, and both chalkbrood fungus and acarine mites from Europe (Seeley 2017b). Returning to the SIR model, it follows that beekeepers should reduce as much as possible the introduction of new colonies that represent the “Susceptibles” into an apiary. If these introduced colonies are exposed to or are carrying a novel pathogen, then they can produce outbreaks. Specifically, Delaplane (2017) warns against bringing in outside bees to replace dead outs and recommends instead that these apiary losses should be replaced by splits made within the same apiary. Loftus et al. (2016) found in their study of the effects of colony size and frequent swarming on resistance to Varroa that 60 m was not a sufficient distance between apiaries to avoid spread of Varroa between apiaries during a nectar dearth. Three of the 12 small‐hive colonies in this experiment suddenly acquired high mite loads when one of the large‐hive colonies collapsed in the adjacent apiary. Evidently, robbers from these three small colonies brought home Varroa from the large colony that was collapsing, resulting in their own collapses several weeks later. It is therefore recommended that introducing new colonies to an apiary be done only after an appropriate period of quarantine in a separate location at least 1 km away.
Goal 3: Design Apiary as Close to Nature as Feasible
The idea that the “design” of an organism is a product of natural selection, which favors survival and reproduction, is the foundation for modern biology and is the basis for Darwinian beekeeping. The fitness of a honey bee colony is directly related to its ability to survive as a healthy unit and to cast viable swarms and produce fertile drones. It follows that we should aim to help our colonies survive and reproduce, if we want them to be part of a healthy population in the area. This viewpoint is perhaps the most challenging for the beekeeper to adopt because it is, in a sense, a break from managing colonies to maximize their production of goods (honey) and services (pollination). If, however, our goal as beekeepers and bee doctors is to sustain populations of healthy colonies of bees, then we should consider making changes in bee management practices that are in keeping with wild colony biology (Seeley 2017b):
First, keep the number of hives in an apiary to a small number to reduce crowding. High colony density promotes robbing and drifting, and thus the mixing of pathogens among host colonies. This mixing (“horizontal transmission”) can favor the evolution of virulence in pathogens and eventually lead to the collapse of colonies.
Second, keep hive size small to avoid creating colonies with large brood chambers that support large, continually running “assembly lines” of mite reproduction. Seeley (2017b) suggests using one deep hive body for a brood nest and one shallow super over a queen excluder for harvesting some honey.
Third, perform colony splits (as a method to mimic swarming behavior) to initiate a broodless period that creates a break in reproduction by Varroa mites (Loftus et al. 2016). A beekeeper makes a split (a small, new colony) by removing from a colony its queen and some of its worker bees and brood, and putting them in a separate hive. The remainder of the colony, still living in the original hive, then rears a replacement queen.
Fourth, space colonies as widely as possible (>10 m) and face their hives in different directions to reduce the drifting of returning foragers into the hives of neighboring colonies (Seeley and Smith 2015). Artistic beekeepers can also color code their hives or add unique graphic designs (geometric shapes of color work well!) above the hive entrance to help the bees orient back to their own hives. The anatomy and physiology of the bee, which will be outlined in future chapters, will help guide the beekeeper in choosing colors and patterns most suitable to optimize