Handbook of Clinical Gender Medicine. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Handbook of Clinical Gender Medicine - Группа авторов страница 40
Even when women and men experience the same stressful life events, women may be more likely than men to develop depression because of sex differences in self-concepts or coping styles. Women are more likely than men to feel strong emotional ties with a wide range of people in their lives and to see their roles as caregivers and partners as central to their self-concepts. Developing strong social support networks can protect women against adversity; however, excessive concern over relationships may cause women to put aside their own wants and needs. Women’s greater interpersonal orientation may create more interpersonal stress in their lives and make them more vulnerable to stress when it occurs. Furthermore, men and women often use different coping styles in stressful situations. Women are more likely than men to ruminate in response to depressed or anxious moods, and researchers suggest that rumination contributes to the higher prevalence of depression in women [13].
Genetics
There is strong evidence for familiality in major depression, and men and women appear to share most but not all genetic influences for the disorder [14]. Certain sex-linked traits may play a role; for example, the uVNTR polymorphism of the MAOA gene on the X chromosome has been found to confer vulnerability to depression more in women than in men [15]. Similarly, estrogen receptor-beta (ER-β) appears to play a role in anxiety: Krezel et al. [16] reported an increase in anxiety-related behaviors in ER-β knockout female mice but not in males.
Gonadal Steroids
The increased rate of depression in women during puberty, when gonadal hormone systems are activated, suggests that hormones may contribute to sex differences in depression. Research linking affective disturbances in women with periods of hormonal change – particularly during the premenstrual and postpartum periods – further reinforces this hypothesis.
It has long been debated whether the postpartum period is a time of increased risk for mood disorders, because the overall prevalence of depression does not appear to be higher in women after delivery compared with age-matched comparison women. Epidemiological studies have estimated the 12-month prevalence rate of major depressive disorder in women of childbearing age to be 12% [2], and a meta-analysis of 59 studies of postpartum depression (PPD) estimated a similar prevalence rate of 13% [17]. However, serious depression requiring admission to the hospital is clearly more prevalent following childbirth; Kendell et al. [18] found that the relative risk of psychiatric admission was extremely high during the first 30 days after childbirth and remained higher than it was before pregnancy for at least 2 years after giving birth. A Danish study compared the rates of hospital admissions or outpatient visits for mental disorders of more than 2 million adults and found that new mothers had a higher risk of depressive disorders during the first 5 months after giving birth [19].
Studies have failed to find consistent hormonal differences in women with and without PPD, leading researchers to hypothesize that the typical hormonal changes during the postpartum period may directly increase the risk of depression but only in some women. A study by Bloch et al. [20] used leuprolide in conjunction with high-dose estradiol and progesterone to create a scaled-down model of pregnancy and the puerperium. Using this model, investigators demonstrated that high-dose hormone add-back followed by abrupt withdrawal elicited dramatic depressive symptoms in euthymic women with a history of PPD. No mood symptoms were evident in women lacking that history. This study demonstrated that, despite the absence of consistent evidence of abnormal hormonal levels in women with PPD, gonadal steroids were nonetheless directly involved in triggering the depressive episodes in a susceptible population.
The hormonal changes throughout the menstrual cycle have also been implicated in affective dysregulation in women. Although many women report mild-to-moderate physical or emotional symptoms during the late luteal phase of their menstrual cycle, approximately 5–10% experience significant mood disturbances in the days prior to menses. This condition, known as premenstrual dysphoric disorder, like PPD, represents a differential affective response to normal fluctuations in steroid levels in a susceptible population. Although the source of this susceptibility is unknown, controlled, double-blind studies manipulating gonadal steroid levels have clearly demonstrated a role of estradiol and progesterone in a subset of depressions in women – those related to reproductive events – thus suggesting a possible sex-dependent source of variance in the etiopathogenesis of depression.
Integrated Model of Depression
No single factor can explain the sex difference in depression; rather, it is likely the result of complex interactions between biological and environmental factors. As research has shown, the impact of sex differences may be elicited only in certain environmental contexts. For example, Curley et al. [21] demonstrated that maternal cues early in life can impact behavioral development in offspring. Impaired maternal care (e.g. decreased licking and grooming of pups) led to increased neophobia and decreased exploratory behavior in female offspring only [21]. Researchers demonstrated that this was not due to inheritance of a genetic mutation but instead was due to an epigenetic modification. Moreover, transgenerational effects were also observed: The female offspring went on to display impaired maternal care as well, and their own female pups also displayed neophobic phenotypes. Mueller and Bale [22] examined the behavior of mice exposed to stress during gestation and found that early prenatal stress contributed to a stress-sensitive phenotype in male mice only. These studies illustrate that sex-specific programming begins very early in life and may contribute to the vulnerability to environmental stressors; additionally they provide key insight into the underlying programming of sex-biased neurodevelopmental disorders such as depression.
References
1 Weissman MM, Bland RC, Canino GJ, et al: Cross-national epidemiology of major depression and bipolar disorder. JAMA 1996;276:293–299.
2 Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Swart M, Blazer DG, Nelson CB: Sex and depression in the national comorbidity survey. 1. Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence. J Affect Disord 1993;29:85–96.
3 Rubinow DR, Moore M: Sex-dependent modulation of treatment response. Dialoques Clin Neurosci 2004;6:39–51.
4 Hamilton JA, Grant M, Jensvold