A. Landes, London: Routledge, 2012. A good overview is Claude Imbert, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Paris: ADPF, 2006.150 150. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, La Structure du comportement, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1942; The Structure of Behavior, trans. Alden L. Fisher, Boston: Beacon Press, 1963. There is a folder of notes on both books in BNF NAF28730 (33a).
151 151. Merleau-Ponty, La Structure du comportement, i; The Structure of Behavior, iii.
152 152. Martin Heidegger, GA6.1, 42; Nietzsche, trans. David Farrell Krell, Frank Capuzzi and Joan Stambaugh, San Francisco: Harper Collins, 4 vols, 1991, vol. I, 45. In The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics, Heidegger does use work from biology, notably Jakob von Uexküll, in this way.
153 153. Alphonse de Waelhens, ‘Une Philosophie de l’ambiguïté’, in Merleau-Ponty, La Structure du comportement, vi; ‘Foreword to the Second French Edition: A Philosophy of the Ambiguous’, The Structure of Behavior, xix.
154 154. Mauriac, Le Temps immobile 3, 530.
155 155. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, L’Union de l’âme et du corps chez Malebranche, Biran et Bergson, ed. Jean Depruin, Paris: Vrin, 2nd edn, 1978 [1968]; The Incarnate Subject: Malebranche, Biran, and Bergson on the Union of Body and Soul, ed. Andrew Bjelland, Jr and Patrick Burke, trans. Paul B. Milan, Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2001.
156 156. Jacques Taminiaux, ‘Preface to the English Translation’, The Incarnate Subject, 9–13, 13. Foucault’s notes are in BNF NAF28730 (38), Folder 1.
157 157. Merleau-Ponty, L’Union, 30–4; The Incarnate Subject, 49–52.
158 158. Merleau-Ponty, L’Union, 59; The Incarnate Subject, 71.
159 159. ‘Appendice’, in Eribon, Michel Foucault et ses contemporains, 262; see DE#330 IV, 434; FL 350. See, for example, ‘The Problem of Speech’, summarized in Résumés de cours, Collège de France 1952–1960, Paris: Gallimard, 1968, 33–42; In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. John Wild, James Edie and John O’Neill, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988, 87–94.
160 160. Merleau-Ponty à la Sorbonne: Résumés de ses cours, special issue of Bulletin de psychologie, 18 (236), 1964; Merleau-Ponty à la Sorbonne: Résumé de cours 1949–1952, Paris: Cynara, 1988. The definitive edition is Psychologie et pédagogie de l’enfant: Cours de Sorbonne 1949–1952, Verdier, 2001.
161 161. BNF NAF28803 (3), Folder 7, untitled ms. 7, 9, 31.
162 162. Merleau-Ponty, Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–1952, trans. Talia Welsh, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010.
163 163. His candidacy presentation is ‘Un Inédit de Maurice Merleau-Ponty’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 67 (4), 1962, 401–9; ‘An Unpublished Text by Maurice Merleau-Ponty: A Prospectus of his Work’, in The Primacy of Perception, and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, ed. James M. Edie, trans. Arleen B. Dallery, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964, 3–11. His inaugural lecture is Éloge de la philosophie, Paris: Gallimard, 1953; In Praise of Philosophy, 3–64. His course summaries are in Résumés de cours; The Praise of Philosophy, 71–199.
164 164. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Le Monde sensible et le monde de l’expression: Cours au Collège de France Notes, 1953, ed. Emmanuel de Saint Aubert and Stefan Kristensen, Genève: Mētispress, 2011; The Sensible World and the World of Expression, trans. Bryan Smyth, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2020.
165 165. The summary is useful: Merleau-Ponty, Résumés de cours, 11–21; The Praise of Philosophy, 71–9.
166 166. Most of Merleau-Ponty’s major works, though not La Structure du comportement, none of the lecture courses, and not all the essays, can be found in Œuvres, ed. Claude Lefort, Paris: Gallimard, 2010. It includes Claude Lefort, ‘Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Vie et œuvre 1908–1961’, 27–99.
167 167. See Judith Revel, Foucault avec Merleau-Ponty: Ontologie politique, présentisme et histoire, Paris: Vrin, 2015.
168 168. William Lewis, ‘Louis Althusser’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2018, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/althusser/. André Chervel, ‘Les Agrégés de l’enseignement secondaire. Répertoire 1809–1960’, 2015, http://rhe.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/?q=agregsec-ondaire_laureats
169 169. Alan Schrift, ‘The Effects of the Agrégation de Philosophie on Twentieth-Century French Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6 (3), 2008, 449–73, 452 n. 6.
170 170. BNF NAF28730 (38), folder 1, has notes that look like a course by Althusser under this title. For Althusser’s engagement with psychoanalysis, see Écrits sur la psychanalyse: Freud et Lacan, ed. Olivier Corpet and François Matheron, Paris: Stock/IMEC, 1993; Writings on Psychoanalysis: Freud and Lacan, trans. Jeffrey Mehlman, New York: Columbia University Press, 1996; and Psychanalyse et sciences humaines: Deux conférences (1963–1964), ed. Olivier Corpet and François Matheron, Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1996.
171 171. Louis Althusser, Montesquieu, la politique et l’histoire, Paris: PUF, 1959; ‘Montesquieu: Politics and History’ in Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Marx, trans. Ben Brewster, London: New Left Books, 1972, 9–109; Politique et histoire, de Machiavel à Marx: Cours à l’École Normale supérieure de 1955 à 1972, ed. François Matheron, Paris: Seuil, 2006; and Cours sur Rousseau (1972), ed. Yves Vargas, Paris: Le Temps des Cerises, 2012. Other courses were attended by Émile Jalley, whose notes are in Louis Althusser et quelques autres: Notes de cours 1958–1959 Hyppolite, Badiou, Lacan, Hegel, Marx, Alain, Wallon, Paris: L’Harmattan, 2014.
172 172. Louis Althusser to Lucien Sève, posted 13 February 1951, in Correspondance 1949–1987, Paris: Éditions Sociales, 2018, 24–5, briefly mentions the division of writing tasks between different students for a pamphlet on anti-Sovietism, including Foucault on ‘degrading French Intelligence’.
173 173. For this description I have relied on Alan D. Schrift, ‘Is there Such a Thing as ‘French Philosophy’? Or why do we Read the French so Badly’, in Julian Bourg (ed.), After the Deluge: New Perspectives on the Intellectual and Cultural History of Postwar France, Lanham: Lexington, 2004, 21–47, 23–5; Schrift, ‘The Effects of the Agrégation de Philosophie’; and Baring, The Young Derrida and French Philosophy, 224–6. Baring’s chapter 7 provides a good general discussion. On the longer history, see André Chervel, Histoire de l’agrégation: Contribution à l’histoire de la culture scolaire, Paris: Kimé, 1993.
174 174. ‘Examens et concours: Les Concours de 1950’, La Revue universitaire 58 (4), 1949, 228–33, 228.
175 175. ‘Examens et concours: Les Concours de 1951’, La Revue universitaire 59 (4), 1950, 236–41, 236.
176 176. ‘Les Concours de 1950: Sujets proposés’, La Revue universitaire 59 (3), 1950, 180–91, 180.
177 177. ‘Les Concours de 1951: Sujets proposés’, La Revue universitaire 60 (4), 1951, 242–8, 242–3.
178 178. See, for example, the influence the choice of Rousseau, Hobbes and Malebranche had on Althusser’s teaching. Yann Moulier Boutang, Louis Althusser: La Formation du mythe, Paris: Livre du Poche, 2002, 2 vols, vol. II, 402.
179 179.
