appropriation of innovation remains a subject to be questioned because of the evolution of society from the point of view of the consumer, who is now more creative and has more power over the organization, of the members of the organization whose status is more protean than before, and also of the question of the ownership of this innovation.
2.5. Conclusion
This chapter showed that innovation management is a discipline in constant development, at least according to the three dimensions chosen here, namely, space, time and matter. Inspired by technological and social developments, practitioners and researchers are therefore redoubling their creativity to invent new tools and practices likely to improve the course of the innovation process, hoping for “Eureka” by aiming for the moon.
It should be remembered that there are many key points to understanding innovation management (Fagerberg et al. 2006; Shane 2009; Burger-Helmchen et al. 2016; Shalley et al. 2016; Paulus and Nijstad 2019). Each provides subtle insights into a particular aspect of the complex process of innovation. However, they all share the belief that innovation needs the individual, the team, the organization and the markets to succeed and spread, which is why it is important to continue to consider this in future research on innovation management.
2.6. References
Agogué, M. (2016). Alex F. Osborn : le brainstorming, premier outil de support à la pensée créative. In Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité, 1st edition, Burger-Helmchen, T., Hussler, C., Cohendet, P. (eds). Editions EMS, Paris.
Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B. (1988a). A quoi tient le succès des innovations ? Gérer et comprendre. Annales des mines, les annales des mines, 4–17.
Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B. (1988b). L’art de l’intéressement : le choix des porte-parole. Gérer et comprendre. Annales des mines, les annales des mines, 14–29.
Amabile, T. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(2), 123–167.
Amezcua, A., Grimes, M., Bradley, S., Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628–1654.
Antonelli, C. (1997). The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 643–675.
Audretsch, D. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bathelt, H., Cohendet, P., Henn, S., Simon, L. (2017). The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Northampton, MA.
Belussi, F. and Sedita, S. (2009). Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505–528.
Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. Harper & Row, New York.
Binctin, N. (2015). Stratégie d’entreprise et propriété intellectuelle. LGDJ, Paris.
Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., Barsoux, J.-L. (2012). The 5 myths of innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 43–50.
Bohas, A., Faure, S., De Vaujany, F.-X. (2017). Tiers-lieux & espaces collaboratifs : laboratoires et révélateurs des nouvelles pratiques de travail. Paper, RGCS (Research Group on Collaborative Spaces).
Boisot, M. and Macmillan, I.C. (2004). Crossing epistemological boundaries: Managerial and entrepreneurial approaches to knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 37(6), 505–524.
Bollinger, S.R. (2020). Creativity and forms of managerial control in innovation processes: Tools, viewpoints and practices. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(2), 214–229.
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification : les économies de grandeur. Éditions Gallimard, Paris.
Boschma, R. (2004). Proximité et innovation. Économie rurale, 280(1), 8–24.
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1970). Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement. Editions de minuit, Paris.
Briscoe, R. and Ward, M. (2000). The Competitive Advantages of Co-Operatives. Centre for Cooperative Studies, National University of Ireland, Cork.
Broca, S. and Coriat, B. (2015). Le logiciel libre et les communs : deux formes de résistance et d’alternative à l’exclusivisme propriétaire. Revue internationale de droit économique, 29(3), 265–284.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design. How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperCollins, New York.
Burgelman, R. (1993). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.
Burger-Helmchen, T. and Raedersdorf, S. (2018). Pro En Management. Vuibert, Paris.
Burger-Helmchen, T., Hussler, C., Cohendet, P. (2016). Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité, 1st edition. Editions EMS, Paris.
Camagni, R. (1991). Local “milieu”, uncertainty and innovation networks: Towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, Camagni, R. (ed.). Belhaven Press, London.
Capelli, S., Falchi, A., Hussler, C., Sabadie, W. (2016). Co-innover avec ses consommateurs : oui, mais lesquels ? De l’intérêt d’impliquer les consommateurs-membres dans le processus d’innovation des entreprises coopératives. Gestion 2000, 33(4), 117–141.
Carrier, C. and Gélinas, S. (2011). Quelles pratiques les pme peuvent-elles utiliser pour favoriser l’intrapreneuriat ? Gestion, 36(4), 22–33.
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Cambridge.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27.
Christensen, C.M., Raynor, M.E., McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.
Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cohendet, P. and Llerena, P. (1997). Learning, technical change and public policy: How to create and exploit diversity. In Systems of Innovation, Edquist C. (eds). Pinter, London.
Cohendet, P. and Simon, L. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on creativity in innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(7), 5–13.
Cova,
