Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
30. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
31. What is the extent or complexity of the Safe Working Load problem?
<--- Score
32. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
33. What is the Safe Working Load problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
34. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
35. Think about the people you identified for your Safe Working Load project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
36. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
37. Who should resolve the Safe Working Load issues?
<--- Score
38. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
39. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Safe Working Load? In other words, what are the risks, if Safe Working Load does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
40. Which information does the Safe Working Load business case need to include?
<--- Score
41. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
42. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
43. What would happen if Safe Working Load weren’t done?
<--- Score
44. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
45. What are your needs in relation to Safe Working Load skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
46. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
47. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Safe Working Load team, Safe Working Load itself?
<--- Score
48. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
49. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
50. Why the need?
<--- Score
51. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
52. What Safe Working Load coordination do you need?
<--- Score
53. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
54. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
55. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
56. What Safe Working Load events should you attend?
<--- Score
57. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Safe Working Load delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
58. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
59. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
60. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
61. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
62. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
63. Do you recognize Safe Working Load achievements?
<--- Score
64. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
65. What Safe Working Load capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
66. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
67. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
68. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
69. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
70. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
71. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
72. Did you miss any major Safe Working Load issues?
<--- Score
73. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<---
