60. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
61. Are the Safe Working Load requirements testable?
<--- Score
62. Is special Safe Working Load user knowledge required?
<--- Score
63. What happens if Safe Working Load’s scope changes?
<--- Score
64. Do you all define Safe Working Load in the same way?
<--- Score
65. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
66. Is the scope of Safe Working Load defined?
<--- Score
67. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
68. Has a Safe Working Load requirement not been met?
<--- Score
69. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
70. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
71. How will the Safe Working Load team and the group measure complete success of Safe Working Load?
<--- Score
72. What are the Safe Working Load use cases?
<--- Score
73. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Safe Working Load results are met?
<--- Score
74. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
75. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
76. Will a Safe Working Load production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
77. Is there a critical path to deliver Safe Working Load results?
<--- Score
78. Is Safe Working Load required?
<--- Score
79. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
80. Is there a Safe Working Load management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
81. What was the context?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of Safe Working Load?
<--- Score
83. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
84. Is the Safe Working Load scope manageable?
<--- Score
85. What is the scope of the Safe Working Load effort?
<--- Score
86. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
87. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
88. What are the Safe Working Load tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
89. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Safe Working Load changes?
<--- Score
90. What are the core elements of the Safe Working Load business case?
<--- Score
91. Is Safe Working Load currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
92. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
94. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
95. When is/was the Safe Working Load start date?
<--- Score
96. Who are the Safe Working Load improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
97. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
98. Is the Safe Working Load scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
99. Is there any additional Safe Working Load definition of success?
<--- Score
100. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
101. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
102. Is Safe Working Load linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
103. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
104.
