Score
16. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
17. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
18. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Safe Working Load? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
19. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
20. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
21. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Safe Working Load goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
22. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
23. How do you manage unclear Safe Working Load requirements?
<--- Score
24. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
25. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
26. Is there a clear Safe Working Load case definition?
<--- Score
27. How would you define Safe Working Load leadership?
<--- Score
28. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Safe Working Load brings?
<--- Score
29. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
30. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
31. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
32. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
33. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
34. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
35. What is the context?
<--- Score
36. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
37. What gets examined?
<--- Score
38. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
39. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
40. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
41. Why are you doing Safe Working Load and what is the scope?
<--- Score
42. How do you manage changes in Safe Working Load requirements?
<--- Score
43. What sources do you use to gather information for a Safe Working Load study?
<--- Score
44. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
45. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
46. What Safe Working Load requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
47. How do you hand over Safe Working Load context?
<--- Score
48. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
49. How are consistent Safe Working Load definitions important?
<--- Score
50. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
51. What are the record-keeping requirements of Safe Working Load activities?
<--- Score
52. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
53. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
54. How do you gather Safe Working Load requirements?
<--- Score
55. Are accountability and ownership for Safe Working Load clearly defined?
<--- Score
56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
57. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
58. Who is gathering Safe Working Load information?
<--- Score
59. Does the scope remain the same?
<---
