<--- Score
99. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
100. Will a Community organizations production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
101. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
102. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
103. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Community organizations work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
104. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
105. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
106. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
107. When is/was the Community organizations start date?
<--- Score
108. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
109. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
110. Is there a clear Community organizations case definition?
<--- Score
111. Are the Community organizations requirements testable?
<--- Score
112. Is the Community organizations scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
113. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Community organizations results are met?
<--- Score
114. What are the Community organizations use cases?
<--- Score
115. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
116. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
117. What gets examined?
<--- Score
118. Is there a critical path to deliver Community organizations results?
<--- Score
119. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
120. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
121. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
122. How do you think the partners involved in Community organizations would have defined success?
<--- Score
123. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
124. What is the scope of the Community organizations effort?
<--- Score
125. Is there a Community organizations management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
126. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
127. Who is gathering Community organizations information?
<--- Score
128. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
129. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
130. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
131. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
132. Will team members perform Community organizations work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
133. What Community organizations requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
134. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
135. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
136. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
137. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Community organizations Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
