Information Modelling’s improvement team?
<--- Score
58. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
59. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
60. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
61. How would you define Information Modelling leadership?
<--- Score
62. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
63. How did the Information Modelling manager receive input to the development of a Information Modelling improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
64. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
65. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
66. What are the core elements of the Information Modelling business case?
<--- Score
67. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. What happens if Information Modelling’s scope changes?
<--- Score
70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
72. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
73. What is the scope of the Information Modelling work?
<--- Score
74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information Modelling leverage and how?
<--- Score
75. Are the Information Modelling requirements testable?
<--- Score
76. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
77. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
78. Is there any additional Information Modelling definition of success?
<--- Score
79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
80. How will the Information Modelling team and the group measure complete success of Information Modelling?
<--- Score
81. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
82. How do you catch Information Modelling definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
83. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
84. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
85. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
86. Do you all define Information Modelling in the same way?
<--- Score
87. Has a Information Modelling requirement not been met?
<--- Score
88. Have all basic functions of Information Modelling been defined?
<--- Score
89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
91. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
92. How do you manage changes in Information Modelling requirements?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage unclear Information Modelling requirements?
<--- Score
94. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
95. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
96. What are the Information Modelling tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
97. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information Modelling?
<--- Score
98. Is there a critical path to deliver Information Modelling results?
<--- Score
99. Is the Information Modelling scope manageable?
<--- Score
100. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
101.
