How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
102. How can the value of Information Modelling be defined?
<--- Score
103. Who approved the Information Modelling scope?
<--- Score
104. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
105. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
106. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
107. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
108. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
109. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
110. Who is gathering Information Modelling information?
<--- Score
111. Is the Information Modelling scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
112. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
113. Has the Information Modelling work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
114. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
115. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
116. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information Modelling activities?
<--- Score
117. How do you think the partners involved in Information Modelling would have defined success?
<--- Score
118. Is Information Modelling currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of Information Modelling?
<--- Score
120. Do you have a Information Modelling success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
122. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information Modelling goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
123. What is in scope?
<--- Score
124. What Information Modelling services do you require?
<--- Score
125. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
126. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
127. What is the scope of the Information Modelling effort?
<--- Score
128. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
129. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
130. What gets examined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information Modelling Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
2. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
3. Does the Information Modelling task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
4. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
5. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
6. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
7. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Information Modelling services/products?
<--- Score
8. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
9. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
10. What do you measure and why?
<---
