Process Group: Resource Economics215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Resource Economics217
3.2 Change Request: Resource Economics219
3.3 Change Log: Resource Economics221
3.4 Decision Log: Resource Economics223
3.5 Quality Audit: Resource Economics225
3.6 Team Directory: Resource Economics228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Resource Economics230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Resource Economics232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Resource Economics234
3.10 Issue Log: Resource Economics236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Resource Economics238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Resource Economics240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Resource Economics242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Resource Economics244
4.4 Risk Audit: Resource Economics246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Resource Economics248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Resource Economics250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Resource Economics252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Resource Economics254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Resource Economics256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Resource Economics258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Resource Economics260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Resource economics?
<--- Score
2. Does your organization need more Resource economics education?
<--- Score
3. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
4. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Resource economics research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
5. Have you identified your Resource economics key performance indicators?
<--- Score
6. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Resource economics delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
7. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
8. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
9. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
10. Why the need?
<--- Score
11. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
12. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
13. Consider your own Resource economics project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
14. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
15. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
16. What Resource economics events should you attend?
<--- Score
17. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
18. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
19. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
20. What are your needs in relation to Resource economics skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
21. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Resource economics team, Resource economics itself?
<--- Score
22. Think about the people you identified for your Resource economics project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
23. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
24. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
25. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
26. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
27. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
28.
