55. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
56. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
59. What was the context?
<--- Score
60. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
61. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
62. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
63. What are (control) requirements for Resource economics Information?
<--- Score
64. Is there a clear Resource economics case definition?
<--- Score
65. What is the definition of Resource economics excellence?
<--- Score
66. Is the Resource economics scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
67. How do you catch Resource economics definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
68. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
69. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
70. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
71. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
72. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
73. Will team members regularly document their Resource economics work?
<--- Score
74. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
75. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
76. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Resource economics results are met?
<--- Score
77. Who is gathering Resource economics information?
<--- Score
78. Are accountability and ownership for Resource economics clearly defined?
<--- Score
79. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
80. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
81. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
82. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
83. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Resource economics?
<--- Score
84. When is/was the Resource economics start date?
<--- Score
85. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
86. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
87. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
88. Is there a critical path to deliver Resource economics results?
<--- Score
89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
90. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
91. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
92. How do you gather Resource economics requirements?
<--- Score
93. What system do you use for gathering Resource economics information?
<--- Score
94. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
95. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
96. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
97. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
98. Are the Resource economics requirements testable?
