style="font-size:15px;"> <--- Score
99. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Resource economics work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
100. What is the scope of the Resource economics effort?
<--- Score
101. Why are you doing Resource economics and what is the scope?
<--- Score
102. What is the scope of Resource economics?
<--- Score
103. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
104. Is special Resource economics user knowledge required?
<--- Score
105. How will the Resource economics team and the group measure complete success of Resource economics?
<--- Score
106. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
107. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Resource economics? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
108. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
109. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
110. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
111. What are the core elements of the Resource economics business case?
<--- Score
112. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
113. Has the Resource economics work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
114. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
115. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
116. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
117. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
118. What happens if Resource economics’s scope changes?
<--- Score
119. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
120. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
121. How do you hand over Resource economics context?
<--- Score
122. Is Resource economics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
123. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
124. Is there a Resource economics management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
125. Are improvement team members fully trained on Resource economics?
<--- Score
126. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
127. How do you manage changes in Resource economics requirements?
<--- Score
128. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
129. What is the context?
<--- Score
130. Is Resource economics required?
<--- Score
131. How does the Resource economics manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
132. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
133. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
134. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
135. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
136. How can the value of Resource economics be defined?
<--- Score
137. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Resource economics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3
