What scope to assess?
<--- Score
12. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
13. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Resource economics changes?
<--- Score
14. Is there any additional Resource economics definition of success?
<--- Score
15. How do you manage unclear Resource economics requirements?
<--- Score
16. How are consistent Resource economics definitions important?
<--- Score
17. What gets examined?
<--- Score
18. How would you define Resource economics leadership?
<--- Score
19. Is Resource economics currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
20. Will a Resource economics production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
21. What Resource economics requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
22. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
23. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
24. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Resource economics leverage and how?
<--- Score
25. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
26. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
27. How did the Resource economics manager receive input to the development of a Resource economics improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
28. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Resource economics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
29. Who approved the Resource economics scope?
<--- Score
30. Do you have a Resource economics success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
31. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
32. Do you all define Resource economics in the same way?
<--- Score
33. What are the record-keeping requirements of Resource economics activities?
<--- Score
34. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
35. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
36. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
37. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
38. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Resource economics brings?
<--- Score
39. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
40. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
41. Has a Resource economics requirement not been met?
<--- Score
42. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
43. Is the scope of Resource economics defined?
<--- Score
44. What are the Resource economics use cases?
<--- Score
45. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
46. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
47. Will team members perform Resource economics work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
48. How do you think the partners involved in Resource economics would have defined success?
<--- Score
49. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
50. What sources do you use to gather information for a Resource economics study?
<--- Score
51. What is the scope of the Resource economics work?
<--- Score
52. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
53. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
54. Who are the Resource economics improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<---
