102. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
103. Is there any additional Construction robots definition of success?
<--- Score
104. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
105. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
106. Is there a critical path to deliver Construction robots results?
<--- Score
107. Is Construction robots linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
108. What are the core elements of the Construction robots business case?
<--- Score
109. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
110. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
111. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
112. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
113. What Construction robots requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
114. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Construction robots? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
115. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
116. Who is gathering Construction robots information?
<--- Score
117. What is the context?
<--- Score
118. What sources do you use to gather information for a Construction robots study?
<--- Score
119. How do you hand over Construction robots context?
<--- Score
120. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
121. How will the Construction robots team and the group measure complete success of Construction robots?
<--- Score
122. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
123. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
124. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
125. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
126. When is/was the Construction robots start date?
<--- Score
127. What Construction robots services do you require?
<--- Score
128. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
129. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
130. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
131. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
132. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
133. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
134. How did the Construction robots manager receive input to the development of a Construction robots improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Construction robots Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the costs?
<--- Score
2. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
3. How do you measure efficient delivery of Construction robots services?
<--- Score
4. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Construction robots? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
5. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
6.
