Who is gathering Fault isolation information?
<--- Score
63. Is Fault isolation currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
64. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
65. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
66. What are (control) requirements for Fault isolation Information?
<--- Score
67. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
68. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Fault isolation work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
69. Are the Fault isolation requirements testable?
<--- Score
70. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
72. How would you define Fault isolation leadership?
<--- Score
73. Will a Fault isolation production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
74. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
75. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Fault isolation?
<--- Score
76. What is the definition of Fault isolation excellence?
<--- Score
77. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
78. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
79. What is the scope of Fault isolation?
<--- Score
80. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
81. How do you hand over Fault isolation context?
<--- Score
82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
83. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
84. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Fault isolation leverage and how?
<--- Score
85. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
86. How do you gather Fault isolation requirements?
<--- Score
87. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
88. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
89. How will the Fault isolation team and the group measure complete success of Fault isolation?
<--- Score
90. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
91. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
92. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
93. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
94. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
95. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
96. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
97. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
98. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
99. What is in scope?
<--- Score
100. What system do you use for gathering Fault isolation information?
<--- Score
101. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
102. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
103. Will team members perform Fault isolation work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
104. What is the scope of the Fault isolation work?
<--- Score
105. Scope of sensitive information?
<---
