Change Request: Medical Scoring218
3.3 Change Log: Medical Scoring220
3.4 Decision Log: Medical Scoring222
3.5 Quality Audit: Medical Scoring224
3.6 Team Directory: Medical Scoring227
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Medical Scoring229
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Medical Scoring231
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Medical Scoring233
3.10 Issue Log: Medical Scoring235
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Medical Scoring237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Medical Scoring239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Medical Scoring241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Medical Scoring243
4.4 Risk Audit: Medical Scoring245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Medical Scoring247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Medical Scoring249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Medical Scoring251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Medical Scoring253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Medical Scoring255
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Medical Scoring257
5.4 Lessons Learned: Medical Scoring259
Index261
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
2. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
3. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
4. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
5. What situation(s) led to this Medical scoring Self Assessment?
<--- Score
6. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
7. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
8. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
9. Do you need to avoid or amend any Medical scoring activities?
<--- Score
10. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Medical scoring? In other words, what are the risks, if Medical scoring does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
11. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
12. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
13. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
14. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
15. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
16. What Medical scoring events should you attend?
<--- Score
17. What are the expected benefits of Medical scoring to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
18. Do you recognize Medical scoring achievements?
<--- Score
19. Which information does the Medical scoring business case need to include?
<--- Score
20. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
21. What Medical scoring capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
22. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
23. Is it needed?
<--- Score
24. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
25. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
26. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Medical scoring as an effective investment?
<--- Score
27. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
28. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Medical scoring team, Medical scoring itself?
<--- Score
29. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
30. What Medical scoring coordination do you need?
<---
