Score
104. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
105. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
106. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
107. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
108. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
109. Is the scope of Organizing principle defined?
<--- Score
110. Are accountability and ownership for Organizing principle clearly defined?
<--- Score
111. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
112. Are the Organizing principle requirements testable?
<--- Score
113. How will the Organizing principle team and the group measure complete success of Organizing principle?
<--- Score
114. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
115. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Organizing principle results are met?
<--- Score
116. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
117. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
118. When is/was the Organizing principle start date?
<--- Score
119. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Organizing principle work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
120. Do you have a Organizing principle success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
121. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
122. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Organizing principle activities?
<--- Score
124. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Organizing principle leverage and how?
<--- Score
125. How does the Organizing principle manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
126. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
127. Has a Organizing principle requirement not been met?
<--- Score
128. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
129. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
130. What are the Organizing principle use cases?
<--- Score
131. How do you catch Organizing principle definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
132. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
133. How would you define Organizing principle leadership?
<--- Score
134. What system do you use for gathering Organizing principle information?
<--- Score
135. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
136. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
137. Is the Organizing principle scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
138. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
139. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
140. What are the core elements of the Organizing principle business case?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Organizing principle Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
