Score
97. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
98. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
99. How do you gather Critical Process Parameters requirements?
<--- Score
100. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
101. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
102. Why are you doing Critical Process Parameters and what is the scope?
<--- Score
103. How do you manage unclear Critical Process Parameters requirements?
<--- Score
104. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
105. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Critical Process Parameters brings?
<--- Score
106. Is Critical Process Parameters currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
107. What are the Critical Process Parameters use cases?
<--- Score
108. Are accountability and ownership for Critical Process Parameters clearly defined?
<--- Score
109. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
110. Are the Critical Process Parameters requirements testable?
<--- Score
111. How have you defined all Critical Process Parameters requirements first?
<--- Score
112. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
113. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Critical Process Parameters goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
114. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
115. Will team members perform Critical Process Parameters work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
116. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
117. How does the Critical Process Parameters manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
118. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
119. Will team members regularly document their Critical Process Parameters work?
<--- Score
120. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
121. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
122. What is in scope?
<--- Score
123. What Critical Process Parameters services do you require?
<--- Score
124. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
125. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
126. How can the value of Critical Process Parameters be defined?
<--- Score
127. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
128. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
129. Is the Critical Process Parameters scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
130. Is special Critical Process Parameters user knowledge required?
<--- Score
131. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
132. Are the Critical Process Parameters requirements complete?
<--- Score
133. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
134. How do you think the partners involved in Critical Process Parameters would have defined success?
<--- Score
135. What are the Critical Process Parameters tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
136. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
137. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
138. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
139. What is the scope of Critical Process Parameters?
<--- Score
140. Is there a clear
