71. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
72. Who should resolve the Critical Process Parameters issues?
<--- Score
73. Think about the people you identified for your Critical Process Parameters project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
74. Who needs to know about Critical Process Parameters?
<--- Score
75. What is the extent or complexity of the Critical Process Parameters problem?
<--- Score
76. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Critical Process Parameters as an effective investment?
<--- Score
77. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
78. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Critical Process Parameters?
<--- Score
79. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
80. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
81. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
82. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
83. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
84. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
85. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
86. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
87. Does your organization need more Critical Process Parameters education?
<--- Score
88. What situation(s) led to this Critical Process Parameters Self Assessment?
<--- Score
89. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Critical Process Parameters team, Critical Process Parameters itself?
<--- Score
90. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
91. Consider your own Critical Process Parameters project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
92. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Critical Process Parameters research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
93. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
94. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
95. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
96. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Critical Process Parameters delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
97. Will Critical Process Parameters deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Critical Process Parameters Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Critical Process Parameters work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
2. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
3. What system do you use for gathering Critical Process Parameters information?
<--- Score
4. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
5. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
6. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
7. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
8. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
9. Is there a critical path to deliver Critical Process Parameters results?
<---
