<--- Score
55. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Critical Process Parameters leverage and how?
<--- Score
56. Who is gathering Critical Process Parameters information?
<--- Score
57. Do you all define Critical Process Parameters in the same way?
<--- Score
58. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
59. Is there a Critical Process Parameters management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
60. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
61. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
62. Has the Critical Process Parameters work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
63. How are consistent Critical Process Parameters definitions important?
<--- Score
64. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Critical Process Parameters changes?
<--- Score
65. Will a Critical Process Parameters production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
66. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
67. What are the core elements of the Critical Process Parameters business case?
<--- Score
68. How do you catch Critical Process Parameters definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
69. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
70. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
71. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
72. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
73. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
74. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
75. Who are the Critical Process Parameters improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
76. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Critical Process Parameters?
<--- Score
77. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
78. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
79. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
80. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
81. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
82. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
83. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
84. What was the context?
<--- Score
85. Has a Critical Process Parameters requirement not been met?
<--- Score
86. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
87. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Critical Process Parameters results are met?
<--- Score
88. Is Critical Process Parameters linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
89. What happens if Critical Process Parameters’s scope changes?
<--- Score
90. How will the Critical Process Parameters team and the group measure complete success of Critical Process Parameters?
<--- Score
91. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
92. How did the Critical Process Parameters manager receive input to the development of a Critical Process Parameters improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
93. What gets examined?
<--- Score
94. What is the definition of Critical Process Parameters excellence?
<--- Score
95. How do you hand over Critical Process Parameters context?
<--- Score
96. What information do you gather?
<---
