Score
12. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
13. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
14. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
15. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Financial intelligence brings?
<--- Score
16. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
17. Why are you doing Financial intelligence and what is the scope?
<--- Score
18. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
19. Who are the Financial intelligence improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
20. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
21. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
22. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
23. Who is gathering Financial intelligence information?
<--- Score
24. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Financial intelligence work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
25. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
26. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
27. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Financial intelligence results are met?
<--- Score
28. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
29. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
30. Are accountability and ownership for Financial intelligence clearly defined?
<--- Score
31. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
32. Do you all define Financial intelligence in the same way?
<--- Score
33. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
34. What would be the goal or target for a Financial intelligence’s improvement team?
<--- Score
35. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
36. Has the Financial intelligence work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
37. What system do you use for gathering Financial intelligence information?
<--- Score
38. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
39. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
40. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
41. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
42. What are (control) requirements for Financial intelligence Information?
<--- Score
43. How would you define Financial intelligence leadership?
<--- Score
44. Is there a clear Financial intelligence case definition?
<--- Score
45. Will team members perform Financial intelligence work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
46. Is there a Financial intelligence management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
47. How do you gather Financial intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
48. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
49. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
50. How do you catch Financial intelligence definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
51. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
52. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is
