for a Financial intelligence study?
<--- Score
98. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
99. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
100. How do you manage unclear Financial intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
101. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
102. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
103. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
104. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
105. How are consistent Financial intelligence definitions important?
<--- Score
106. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
107. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
108. What is the scope of Financial intelligence?
<--- Score
109. What is the context?
<--- Score
110. What is in scope?
<--- Score
111. When is/was the Financial intelligence start date?
<--- Score
112. Will team members regularly document their Financial intelligence work?
<--- Score
113. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
114. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
115. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
116. What is the scope of the Financial intelligence work?
<--- Score
117. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
118. What are the core elements of the Financial intelligence business case?
<--- Score
119. Is the Financial intelligence scope manageable?
<--- Score
120. Is the Financial intelligence scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
121. Who approved the Financial intelligence scope?
<--- Score
122. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
123. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Financial intelligence goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
124. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Financial intelligence? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
125. Is there a critical path to deliver Financial intelligence results?
<--- Score
126. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
127. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
128. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
129. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
130. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
131. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Financial intelligence?
<--- Score
132. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
133. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
134. How does the Financial intelligence manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
135. How can the value of Financial intelligence be defined?
<--- Score
136. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
137. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Financial intelligence Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3
