Score
56. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
57. How do you verify the Person Analysis requirements quality?
<--- Score
58. What are the costs of delaying Person Analysis action?
<--- Score
59. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
60. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
61. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
62. How are you verifying it?
<--- Score
63. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
64. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
65. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
66. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
67. Are there competing Person Analysis priorities?
<--- Score
68. Are missed Person Analysis opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
69. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
70. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
71. The approach of traditional Person Analysis works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
72. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
73. How will you measure your Person Analysis effectiveness?
<--- Score
74. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
75. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
76. How will the Person Analysis data be analyzed?
<--- Score
77. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
78. What are the Person Analysis investment costs?
<--- Score
79. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
80. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
81. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
82. What are the operational costs after Person Analysis deployment?
<--- Score
83. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
84. Is a follow-up focused external Person Analysis review required?
<--- Score
85. When are costs are incurred?
<--- Score
86. How do you verify if Person Analysis is built right?
<--- Score
87. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
88. How is the value delivered by Person Analysis being measured?
<--- Score
89. Does the Person Analysis task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
90. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
91. What are predictive Person Analysis analytics?
<--- Score
92. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
93. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
94. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
95. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
96. Are the Person Analysis benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
97. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
98. What potential environmental factors impact the Person Analysis effort?
<--- Score
99. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
100. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
101. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<---
