Is the Person Analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
63. Is the scope of Person Analysis defined?
<--- Score
64. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
65. What was the context?
<--- Score
66. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
67. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
68. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Person Analysis?
<--- Score
69. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Person Analysis? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
70. What happens if Person Analysis’s scope changes?
<--- Score
71. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
72. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
73. What are the core elements of the Person Analysis business case?
<--- Score
74. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
75. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
76. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
77. How do you hand over Person Analysis context?
<--- Score
78. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
79. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
80. How do you gather Person Analysis requirements?
<--- Score
81. Who are the Person Analysis improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
82. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
83. Do you have a Person Analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
84. What sources do you use to gather information for a Person Analysis study?
<--- Score
85. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
86. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
87. What are (control) requirements for Person Analysis Information?
<--- Score
88. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
90. What is the context?
<--- Score
91. Who approved the Person Analysis scope?
<--- Score
92. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
94. Is Person Analysis required?
<--- Score
95. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
96. Has a Person Analysis requirement not been met?
<--- Score
97. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
98. Is there a Person Analysis management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
99. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
100. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
101. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Person Analysis brings?
<--- Score
102. Is Person Analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
103. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
104. What are the Person Analysis use cases?
<--- Score
105. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
106. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
107. What are the Person Analysis
