by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Systems Architecture Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
2. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
3. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
5. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
6. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
7. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Systems Architecture Service results?
<--- Score
8. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
9. How sensitive must the Systems Architecture Service strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
10. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
11. Is the cost worth the Systems Architecture Service effort ?
<--- Score
12. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
13. How do you verify and validate the Systems Architecture Service data?
<--- Score
14. How do you verify the Systems Architecture Service requirements quality?
<--- Score
15. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
16. Are the Systems Architecture Service benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
17. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
18. At what cost?
<--- Score
19. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
20. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
21. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
22. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Systems Architecture Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
23. What is your Systems Architecture Service quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
24. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
25. How frequently do you track Systems Architecture Service measures?
<--- Score
26. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
27. Does the Systems Architecture Service task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
28. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
29. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
30. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
31. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
32. How frequently do you verify your Systems Architecture Service strategy?
<--- Score
33. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
34. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
35. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
36. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
37. What are the Systems Architecture Service key cost drivers?
<--- Score
38. What are the Systems Architecture Service investment costs?
<--- Score
39. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
40. What are hidden Systems Architecture Service quality costs?
<--- Score
41. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
42.
