Score
25. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
26. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
27. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Systems Architecture Service leader?
<--- Score
28. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
29. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
30. What is the extent or complexity of the Systems Architecture Service problem?
<--- Score
31. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
32. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
33. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
34. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
35. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
36. Think about the people you identified for your Systems Architecture Service project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
37. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
38. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
39. How do you recognize an Systems Architecture Service objection?
<--- Score
40. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
41. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
42. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
43. What is the Systems Architecture Service problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
44. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
45. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Systems Architecture Service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
46. What are the expected benefits of Systems Architecture Service to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
47. What would happen if Systems Architecture Service weren’t done?
<--- Score
48. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
49. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
50. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
51. Did you miss any major Systems Architecture Service issues?
<--- Score
52. What situation(s) led to this Systems Architecture Service Self Assessment?
<--- Score
53. What are your needs in relation to Systems Architecture Service skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
54. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
55. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
56. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
57. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Systems Architecture Service delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
58. Will Systems Architecture Service deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
59. Who should resolve the Systems Architecture Service issues?
<--- Score
60. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
61. What vendors make products that address the Systems Architecture Service needs?
<--- Score
62. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
63. Does Systems Architecture Service create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
64. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
65. What does Systems Architecture Service success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
66. How are the Systems Architecture Service’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
67.
