Score
105. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
106. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
107. Have all basic functions of Public health services been defined?
<--- Score
108. Is the Public health services scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
109. How do you hand over Public health services context?
<--- Score
110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage unclear Public health services requirements?
<--- Score
112. Who are the Public health services improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
113. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Public health services changes?
<--- Score
114. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
115. Who approved the Public health services scope?
<--- Score
116. Is the scope of Public health services defined?
<--- Score
117. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
118. Will a Public health services production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
119. Is special Public health services user knowledge required?
<--- Score
120. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
121. What would be the goal or target for a Public health services’s improvement team?
<--- Score
122. Is Public health services required?
<--- Score
123. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
124. Is the Public health services scope manageable?
<--- Score
125. What are the Public health services tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
126. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
127. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
128. What Public health services requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
129. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
130. Are the Public health services requirements testable?
<--- Score
131. What happens if Public health services’s scope changes?
<--- Score
132. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
133. How do you catch Public health services definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
134. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
135. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Public health services work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
136. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
137. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
138. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
139. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
140. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Public health services? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Public health services Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. The approach of traditional Public health services works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
2. What evidence is there and what is measured?
