vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
31. Why are you doing Cost center and what is the scope?
<--- Score
32. Is special Cost center user knowledge required?
<--- Score
33. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
34. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Cost center brings?
<--- Score
35. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
36. What was the context?
<--- Score
37. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
38. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
39. Will team members perform Cost center work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
40. Are the Cost center requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
42. How will the Cost center team and the group measure complete success of Cost center?
<--- Score
43. When is/was the Cost center start date?
<--- Score
44. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
45. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
46. How can the value of Cost center be defined?
<--- Score
47. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
48. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
49. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
50. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Cost center? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
51. Is the Cost center scope manageable?
<--- Score
52. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
53. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
54. Is Cost center required?
<--- Score
55. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
56. Is Cost center linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
57. Is there a clear Cost center case definition?
<--- Score
58. Have all basic functions of Cost center been defined?
<--- Score
59. What gets examined?
<--- Score
60. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
61. What system do you use for gathering Cost center information?
<--- Score
62. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
63. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
64. What is in scope?
<--- Score
65. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Cost center changes?
<--- Score
66. Is the Cost center scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
67. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
68. How have you defined all Cost center requirements first?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of Cost center?
<--- Score
70. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
71. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
72. What are the record-keeping requirements of Cost center activities?
<--- Score
73. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
74. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Cost center results are met?
<--- Score
75. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<---
