Agree3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
2. Has a Identity In Organizational Communication requirement not been met?
<--- Score
3. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
4. What is the context?
<--- Score
5. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
6. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
7. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
8. Is the Identity In Organizational Communication scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
9. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
10. How do you gather Identity In Organizational Communication requirements?
<--- Score
11. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
12. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
13. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
14. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
15. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
17. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
18. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
19. Is there any additional Identity In Organizational Communication definition of success?
<--- Score
20. Are accountability and ownership for Identity In Organizational Communication clearly defined?
<--- Score
21. How do you think the partners involved in Identity In Organizational Communication would have defined success?
<--- Score
22. What is the definition of Identity In Organizational Communication excellence?
<--- Score
23. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
24. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
25. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
26. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
27. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Identity In Organizational Communication?
<--- Score
28. How can the value of Identity In Organizational Communication be defined?
<--- Score
29. What are the core elements of the Identity In Organizational Communication business case?
<--- Score
30. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
31. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Identity In Organizational Communication? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
32. What gets examined?
<--- Score
33. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
34. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
35. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
36. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
37. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Identity In Organizational Communication goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
39. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
40. What would be the goal or target for a Identity In Organizational Communication’s improvement team?
<--- Score
41. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
