Score
11. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
12. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
13. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
14. What are (control) requirements for Agriculture technology Information?
<--- Score
15. How does the Agriculture technology manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
16. How do you hand over Agriculture technology context?
<--- Score
17. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
18. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
19. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
20. When is/was the Agriculture technology start date?
<--- Score
21. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
22. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
23. Is there a clear Agriculture technology case definition?
<--- Score
24. What sources do you use to gather information for a Agriculture technology study?
<--- Score
25. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Agriculture technology brings?
<--- Score
26. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
27. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
28. How do you gather Agriculture technology requirements?
<--- Score
29. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
30. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
31. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
32. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
33. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Agriculture technology?
<--- Score
34. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
35. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
36. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
37. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
38. How do you manage changes in Agriculture technology requirements?
<--- Score
39. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Agriculture technology goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
40. What is the scope of Agriculture technology?
<--- Score
41. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
42. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
43. What happens if Agriculture technology’s scope changes?
<--- Score
44. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
45. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
46. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
47. What would be the goal or target for a Agriculture technology’s improvement team?
<--- Score
48. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
49. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
50. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
51. What is the scope?
<--- Score
52. What is the context?
<--- Score
53. Is the scope of Agriculture technology defined?
<--- Score
54. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
55. Is Agriculture technology currently on schedule according to the plan?
