style="font-size:15px;"> <--- Score
56. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
58. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Agriculture technology? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
59. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
60. Why are you doing Agriculture technology and what is the scope?
<--- Score
61. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
62. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
63. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Agriculture technology results are met?
<--- Score
64. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
65. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
66. Is there a critical path to deliver Agriculture technology results?
<--- Score
67. What was the context?
<--- Score
68. What are the Agriculture technology use cases?
<--- Score
69. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
70. Is Agriculture technology required?
<--- Score
71. How did the Agriculture technology manager receive input to the development of a Agriculture technology improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
72. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
73. How are consistent Agriculture technology definitions important?
<--- Score
74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
75. What Agriculture technology services do you require?
<--- Score
76. Is the Agriculture technology scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
77. Has a Agriculture technology requirement not been met?
<--- Score
78. What is the scope of the Agriculture technology work?
<--- Score
79. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
80. What is the definition of Agriculture technology excellence?
<--- Score
81. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
82. Is the Agriculture technology scope manageable?
<--- Score
83. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
84. What is in scope?
<--- Score
85. How would you define Agriculture technology leadership?
<--- Score
86. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Agriculture technology work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
87. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
88. How will the Agriculture technology team and the group measure complete success of Agriculture technology?
<--- Score
89. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
90. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
91. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
92. What are the Agriculture technology tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
93. How do you think the partners involved in Agriculture technology would have defined success?
<--- Score
94. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
95. How have you defined all Agriculture technology requirements first?
<--- Score
96. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
97. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
98. What gets examined?
<---
