Score
99. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
100. What are the record-keeping requirements of Agriculture technology activities?
<--- Score
101. Who is gathering Agriculture technology information?
<--- Score
102. Are accountability and ownership for Agriculture technology clearly defined?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
104. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
105. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
106. What Agriculture technology requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
107. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
108. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
109. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
110. Are the Agriculture technology requirements testable?
<--- Score
111. What is the scope of the Agriculture technology effort?
<--- Score
112. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
113. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
114. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
115. Has the Agriculture technology work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
116. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
117. Is there any additional Agriculture technology definition of success?
<--- Score
118. Is Agriculture technology linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
119. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
120. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
121. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
122. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
123. Who are the Agriculture technology improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
124. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
125. Is special Agriculture technology user knowledge required?
<--- Score
126. Is there a Agriculture technology management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
127. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
128. Who approved the Agriculture technology scope?
<--- Score
129. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Agriculture technology leverage and how?
<--- Score
130. Are the Agriculture technology requirements complete?
<--- Score
131. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Agriculture technology Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
2. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
3. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
4. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
5. What are the current costs of the Agriculture technology process?
<---
