Status Report: Microsoft Health216
3.2 Change Request: Microsoft Health218
3.3 Change Log: Microsoft Health220
3.4 Decision Log: Microsoft Health222
3.5 Quality Audit: Microsoft Health224
3.6 Team Directory: Microsoft Health227
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Microsoft Health229
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Microsoft Health231
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Microsoft Health233
3.10 Issue Log: Microsoft Health235
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Microsoft Health237
4.1 Project Performance Report: Microsoft Health239
4.2 Variance Analysis: Microsoft Health241
4.3 Earned Value Status: Microsoft Health243
4.4 Risk Audit: Microsoft Health245
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Microsoft Health247
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Microsoft Health249
5.0 Closing Process Group: Microsoft Health251
5.1 Procurement Audit: Microsoft Health253
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Microsoft Health255
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Microsoft Health257
5.4 Lessons Learned: Microsoft Health259
Index261
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
2. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Microsoft Health will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
3. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
4. Do you need to avoid or amend any Microsoft Health activities?
<--- Score
5. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
6. When a Microsoft Health manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
7. Who needs to know about Microsoft Health?
<--- Score
8. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
9. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
10. Why the need?
<--- Score
11. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
12. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
13. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
14. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
15. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Microsoft Health leader?
<--- Score
16. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
17. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
18. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Microsoft Health project?
<--- Score
19. What are the expected benefits of Microsoft Health to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
20. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
21. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
22. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
23. Consider your own Microsoft Health project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
24. Do you recognize Microsoft Health achievements?
<--- Score
25. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
26. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
27. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Microsoft Health?
<--- Score
28. What Microsoft Health capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
29. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
30.
