Score
24. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
25. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
26. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
27. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
28. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
29. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
30. Is Analytical tool required?
<--- Score
31. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
32. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
33. What sources do you use to gather information for a Analytical tool study?
<--- Score
34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
35. When is/was the Analytical tool start date?
<--- Score
36. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
37. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
39. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
40. Are the Analytical tool requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
42. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
43. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
44. Is the Analytical tool scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
45. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
46. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
47. What is the context?
<--- Score
48. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
49. How will the Analytical tool team and the group measure complete success of Analytical tool?
<--- Score
50. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
51. What is the definition of Analytical tool excellence?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
54. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Analytical tool results are met?
<--- Score
55. How do you catch Analytical tool definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
56. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
57. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
58. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
59. Has a Analytical tool requirement not been met?
<--- Score
60. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
61. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
62. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
63. What is in scope?
<--- Score
64. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
65. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
66. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
67. Will team members perform Analytical tool work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
68. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
