saw them bunched up like unexpected speed bumps in the middle of the expressway. I am, of course, referring to where he said: “Is it not lawful for me to do, what I will, with my own people?”
Let me guess: he’s Jesus in the heat of exalting one of those one-verse-wonders for all the world to witness, and can therefore do and say whatever he wants. Right? Well, I ask you: would not the ride have been made patently smoother and more secure had the son of God actually said, “Is it not lawful for me to do, what is in the best interest, of my own people to do?”
Ahhh… Now we see how words have the power to influence perceived meanings. What you all your life believed to be religious black and white as carved into stone suddenly becomes a more transitory shade of Etch-askectch gray, forcing you to confront those things you always thought you knew to be true. As a result, questions of the mind begin to appear. Queries of the heart start to manifest themselves like unspoken whispers riding the tumultuous winds of a hot restless night. Finally, posers reach up and tug at your soul, as if an unruly child took hold of your sleeve. Yet, this is only the beginning of your journey towards spiritual introspection. And what you find when you arrivare a vostro destino, will change everything! I guarantee it.
So why did the son of God say what he did in Matthew 20:15 regarding “what he will,” the way that he did? To glean a peek at the answer, we need only read from the following assortment of scripture. And yes. It has everything to do with the son of God hording forgiveness. That’s right: hording forgiveness. This being where he stated, albeit for edification: “Go, and declare unto the gentiles, ‘In hearing you will hear, but not understand; and seeing you will see, but not perceive. [Why?] Because you are but Godless ignorant dogs that lap insufferably at the table of Christianity. Besides that, salvation is for the Jews.’”
As you will see; and in short order; these for now undeclared passages are right on the money, one hundred percent accurate. Otherwise, I would have never juxtaposed them over what I have, the way that I did. All I ask is that you stay the course, and give me time to prove it. After all, when it comes to changing that which defines our current world of religion, nothing is easy or you can bet that someone more ancient and wiser than I as seated in the Lotus position from atop his or her mountain would have done it a long time ago. To further secure my position, I give you not the birth of Jesus as Lord and Savior, but the whole reason for his inception. And yes. It has everything to do with salvation being for the Jews. See Matthew 1:18 thru 24 where the Angel Gabriel is telling Joseph about the impending Immaculate Conception. That’s because he then says in verse 21: “Mary will bear a son, and you will call his name Jesus, because he will [what?] save his people from their sins.”
Ah huh.
What we discover, then; and as per the “other” Jesus; is that he is intentionally concealing something. Ah, but he is spiritual grasshopper. Otherwise, there would be no reason for him to say what he did in those verses, the way that he did. Just what that something is, as you now know, concerns the act of hoarding forgiveness from the ill-mannered and ill-bred masses of the world (meaning, all non-Jew heathen as gentiles that have their rotting corpses heaped together in segregated plots) as declared in Mark 4:11, 12 and 13. Why? Because of St. John 4:22, is why. This being where; and just as written in Mark 4:11; he doubles down on one of those peculiar secrets as disseminated from on high, albeit for edification, saying: “You [addressing a Samarian woman at a water well as ignorant heathen] worship what you know not. But we [meaning the twelve apostles gathered with him representing the Hebrew nation] know what we worship, [why?] because salvation is for the Jews.”!
So yes. There it is in full living color for all the world to witness as wrought from the sins of the heart to the proudly defiant lips, as further cast from the belly into the airy draft. An act of which, defiles the man. After all, we know that he is violent, disorderly, unruly, uncontrolled, uncontained, lawless, mutinous, and rebellious. Also, lest we forget: manipulative and selfish. Otherwise, when it came to that oil and its intended use he would have never said to his apostles what he did, the way that he did, over what he did. Nor would he have deflected blame. It’s as simple as that. Yet, there is more. See Matthew 5:39 where he said, as if strangely out of the blue and right on queue: “I say to you that you resist not evil. But whosoever hits you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
However, it’s about resisting evil, along with the total cost of turning the other cheek that concerns us: especially when it comes to violence. Why? Because such a thing only works when it’s convenient for the “slapper” verses the “slappee,” is why. Ah, but it does. And it is. Not only that, but with biblical proof. See Matthew 21:12. “Jesus then went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves.”
Well, so much for turning the other cheek. After all, when it comes to the dictates of resisting evil, the “slapper” needs a bunch of passive “slappees” if he’s to do what he came to do. Right? Yes. Now you know why he said what he did in Matthew 5:39 above, as well as in Matthew 10:24, albeit for edification: “The disciple [Jesus] is not above his master [God,] nor the servant [the slappee] above his lord [the slapper.”]
But then, what happened to Matthew 5:9? This being where he also said of it: “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they will be called the children of God.”
Remember now; and for evil to triumph; it’s only necessary for good people to “turn the other cheek.” And if you only ever turn the other cheek as a result of your religious philosophy, then all you’ll ever get are those people who line up for the sole purpose of slapping you around. And yes. Jesus was fully aware of this. Now you know the rest of the story as to why he went ballistic in the marketplace. The correct answer is to tell you that it was because he tipped his hand. Ah, but he did. Raw emotions can sometimes expose us like that. You know. That turning the other check or operating on a philosophy of forgiveness only works when it’s convenient for the “slapper” verses the “slappee.”
Bingo!
Even so, talk about becoming violent, disorderly, unruly, uncontrolled, uncontained, lawless, mutinous and rebellious, not to mention manipulative and selfish—my gwad people! Yet, I understand that it can be difficult (if not impossible) for people of religion to recognize this event for what it really is. Revisionists did, after all, hide it in plain sight. Then they justify it in the name of religion, as wrought through the act of moral conviction. Moreover, what better way to veil a truth of this nature and magnitude, I ask you: than to use the hanky under our own noses?
Ah huh.
However, I will say this, about that: some hankies, more than others, harbor surprises. Some hankies, more than others, even bear “fruit.” And some hankies, more than others, are loaded to the gills with “Gotchas!” Ah, but they are. And they do. (Just you wait and see.)
And yes. You now know more about God’s cache of secrets, than 99% of the world’s population—to include those whose job it is to guard them! It’s also why Jesus says that, short of a parable, we will never understand the nature of his message(s). To a truth, it’s not because we are unable to wrap our fragile wad of gray matter around it. Rather, it’s because he is telling us something we don’t want to hear. Not only that, but that we will then proceed to read into it exactly what we want to believe, distorting the entire construct of the message. And, guess what? He was right. See Acts 28:27 where he said of it, albeit for edification: “The heart of my people has waxed gross [meaning, they only feel what they want to feel,] and their ears are dull of hearing [meaning, they only hear what they want to hear,] and their eyes have closed [meaning, they only see what they want to see;] lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, to be converted that I should heal them.”
So why would Jesus actively seek to refuse the gentiles of this world the act of salvation,
