reasonably well-distributed among the student demographic. This initial leadership gained perhaps inordinate attention from the media, and also fell prey to manipulation and co-optation by the ruling party, which let to their de-legitimization among rank-and-file protestors.7 University administrative leaders argued that it was not in their power to simply grant universal free education individually or on their own, but that national government would have to subsidize any such policy. Increasingly insurgent new leaders, this time backed by the EFF, perceiving the universities to be the soft underbelly of the “System“, then held universities hostage to government compliance with their demands, but government did not respond. Serious violence followed, and securitization in response, leading to running battles on campuses. Under our then Head, my own department became integrally involved in support of #feesmustfall, and adopted its radical positions, in some cases even encouraging civil disobedience. This was in part due to sensitivity to the perception of anthropology among students as a purveyor of colonial consciousness.
8 Political parties, student politics, and the surrounding popular politics of the society came to the fore after original leaders were forced out and even into hiding. Non-student participation and outside interference and funding by political interests undermined efforts at negotiation and conciliation. Negotiations stalled and were then abandoned. Violent protest including attacks on security and police, destruction of property and facilities and injury to persons increased. Universities responded with a security crackdown, arrests, disciplinary action, expulsions, and criminal charges. With exams looming, most protests were suspended. Where necessary, exams were postponed, but then conducted under high security. Many movement leaders have been charged for public violence and destruction of property and remain incarcerated to this day.
9 Nevertheless, ousted President Jacob Zuma promised to meet the movement’s demands as one of his last acts in office, and ultimately 57 billion rands (3.8 billion euro) were allocated to student financial assistance in the national budget.
These student protests affected my ability to conduct classes, administer the syllabus, and set exams. I was labelled an irredeemable colonialist, even by my colleagues, but I carried on until the end of 2016 and then permanently retired. Although my academic freedom and institutional rights were violated and procedural regulations flouted, I did not make any formal complaint. This was because the beleaguered administration had more important issues to address than mine, and because I considered myself a member of the University community and departmental family whom I would not abandon even if they, temporarily I hoped, abandoned me.
Since 2017, our radical head of department has departed to a more receptive institution, but the influence of #feesmustfall remains potent. Far-left populist politics remains the dominant, narrow discourse. This produces a univocal theoretical paradigm, heavily weighted toward a pedagogy of oppression, in which no one troubles any longer to use the term “neo-liberal“ as a pejorative synonym for capitalism, as “capitalism“ is considered pejorative enough in itself. Other perspectives, non-political subjects and empirical research issues are ignored. But this may not remain the case. As always in anthropology, “the people“ will ultimately have their say.
So I might conclude by noting the equal valence, indeed the inseparability of anthropology’s intellectual and social missions. We cannot know for certain that the ineradicable politicisation of our research field can be methodologically overcome. We cannot know what use will be made of our reportage, or the nature of its unintended consequences. We cannot be sure of finding or occupying the moral high ground, and if we could, that social agencies will take our direction. We cannot even be sure that that our treasured public intellectual role as “rebel angels“ (Gordon and Spiegel 1993:100) committed to exploring the interface between the people and the state as a relationship between a new coloniser and the eternally colonised, can be maintained. But we can be more sure that we have actually discovered and represented what social actors are doing on the ground and why. We can also be confident that this knowledge in itself, applied to teaching, speaking, and writing, constitutes a major form of applied or practical anthropology. We must persuade students that the intellectual values of anthropology are consistent with the meaningful and influential “voice of the people“. We must carry on with our attempts to influence public policy by “speaking truth to power“, but at the same time reclaim the intellectual issues of cultural diversity and social instrumentality as the signature of the common humanity historically championed by anthropology (Coplan 1998).
References
Behrman, Daniel
1965 « Doctor Copans and Monsieur Jazz », Réalités, 1965.
Comaroff, John and Jean Comaroff
2009 Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2012 “Theory from the South, or How Euro-America is Evolving Toward Africa“. Anthropological Forum, 22(2):113–131.
Copans, Jean
2000 « Mondialisation des terrains et/ou internationalisation des traditions disciplinaires ? L’Utopie d’une anthropologie sans frontières », Anthropologie et Sociétés, 24, 1:21-42.
2006 « L’anthropologie a-t-elle raison d’oublier ses traditions ? Où sont donc passés l’économie et le politique ? Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 14, 2:261-271.
2007 “The African Frontiers of Anthropology: Fifty Years of Questioning”, Journal of Anthropologists, 2007:337-370.
2011 « L’Afrique noire comme paradigme fondateur des sciences sociales françaises et francophones du développement (1920-2010) », Ethnologie française, 41 (3) : 405-414.
2013 « Ethnologie, anthropologie et situations coloniales. L’exemple français entre politisation et mystification », dans C. Maurel (dir.), Essais d’histoire globale, Paris, L’Harmattan : 137-159.
2019 « Comment s’engager dans l’anthropologie engagée. Réflexions sur la vérité du terrain et les objets véritables de l’engagement », à paraître, Ateliers d’Anthropologie.
Copans, Simon
1967 : « L’héritage africain dans la musique des Américains », Actes du Colloque sur l’Art nègre, Paris, Présence africaine.
Coplan, David B.
1998 “Fieldsights: The Anthropological Narration of Post-Apartheid South Africa”, African Studies (Johannesburg), 57(2) December: 133–146.
Dunbar, Paul Laurence
1895 “We Wear the Mask”, The Complete Poems of Paul Laurence Dunbar. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.
Gordon, Robert and Andrew Spiegel
1993, “Southern Africa Revisited”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1993 (22): 83–105.
Moore, Celeste Day
2011 ”La passerelle. Simon Copans and the Translation of African-American Culture in Postwar France”, Colloque Histoire du jazz en France, Dijon, CNRS-Université de Bourgogne, mars.
Pottinger, Ken
2012 French News Online, 20 June.
Témoignage
