Обыденное и научное знание об обществе: взаимовлияния и реконфигурации. Коллектив авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Обыденное и научное знание об обществе: взаимовлияния и реконфигурации - Коллектив авторов страница 22

Обыденное и научное знание об обществе: взаимовлияния и реконфигурации - Коллектив авторов

Скачать книгу

style="font-size:15px;">      8. Парсонс Т. Точка зрения автора // Парсонс Т. О социальных системах. М.: Академический проект, 2002. С. 15–72.

      9. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций? // Полис. 1994. № 1. С. 33–48.

      10. Шюц А. Формирование понятия и теории в общественных науках // Шюц А. Избранное: Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. С. 51–68.

      11. Ядов В.А. Современная теоретическая социология как концептуальная база исследования российских трансформаций. СПб.: Интерсоцис, 2009.

      12. Aldrich Н., Ruef М. Organizations Evolving. Second edition. L.: Sage, 2006.

      13. Bartels D., Burnett R. A Group Construal Account of Drop-in-the-Bucket Thinking in Policy Preference and Moral Judgment // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011. Yol. 47. P. 50–57.

      14. Bloom H The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of History. N.Y.: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1995

      15. Bloom P., Veres C. The perceived intentionality of groups // Cognition. 1999. Vol. 71. P. B1-B9.

      16. Brewer M.B., Hong Y.-Y., Li Q. Dynamic Entitativity: Perceiving Groups as Actors // The Psychology of Group Perception: Perceived Variability, Entitativity, and Essentialism. New York and Hove: Psychology Press, 2004. P. 19–29.

      17. Campbell D. T. Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities // Behavioral Science. 1958. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 14–25.

      18. Castano E., Yzerbyt V, Paladino М.-P., Sacchi S. I Belong, therefore, I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 135–143.

      19. Coleman J. Rational Organization // Rationality and Society. 1990. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 94–105.

      20. Cooper D. Collective Responsibility // Philosophy. 1968. Vol. 43, № 165. P. 258–268.

      21. Cutting A., Dunn J. Theory of Mind, Emotion Understanding, Language, and Family Background: Individual Differences and Interrelations // Child Development. 1999. Vol. 70. № 4. P. 853–865.

      22. Douglas M. How Institutions Think. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1986.

      23. Entitativity // PsychWiki – A Collaborative Psychology Wiki. URL: http:// www.psychwiki.com/wiki/Entitativity (date of access: 01.07.2013)

      24. Gil-White F. Are ethnic groups biological ‘species’ to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories // Current Anthropology. 2001. Vol. 42. № 4. P. 515–536.

      25. Hamilton D., Sherman S. Perceiving Persons and Groups // Psychological Review. 1996. Vol. 103. № 2. P. 336–355.

      26. Haslam N. Natural kinds, Human kinds and Essentialism // Social Research. 1998. Vol. 65. № 2.P. 291–314.

      27. Haslam N., Rothschild L., Ernst D. Essentialist beliefs about social categories // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 39. P. 113–127.

      28. Heider F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.

      29. Heider F., Simmel M. An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior // The American Journal of Psychology. 1944. Vol. 57, № 2. P. 243–259.

      30. Hirschfeld L. On a Folk Theory of Society: Children, Evolution, and Mental Representations of Social Groups // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2001. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 107–117.

      31. Kashima Y., Kashima E., Chiu C., Farsides /., Gelfand M., Hong Y., Kim U., Strack F., Werth L., Yuki M., Yzerbyt V. Culture, Essentialism, and Agency: Are Individuals Universally Believed to be More Real Entities than Groups? // European Journal of Social Psychology 2005. Yol. 35. P. 147–169.

      32. Keeley M. Organizational Analogy: A Comparison of Organismic and Social Contract Models //Administrative Science Quarterly. 1980. Yol. 25, № 2. P. 337–362.

      33. Koch S., Deetz S. Metaphor analysis of social reality in organizations // Journal of Applied Communication Research. 1981. Yol. 9(1). P. 1—15.

      34. Fickel B. Hamilton D., Wieczorkowska 67., Lewis A., Sherman SUhles A. Varieties of Groups and the Perception of Group Entitativity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 78. № 2. P. 223–246.

      35. Fickel B., Hamilton D.L., Sherman S.J. Elements of a Lay Theory of Groups: Types of Groups, Relational Styles, and the Perception of Group Entitativity // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2001. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 129–140.

      36. Malle B. How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1999. Yol. 3. № 1. P. 23–48.

      37. Malle B. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.

      38. Malle B. The social and moral cognition of group agents // Journal of Law and Policy. 2010. Vol. 19. P. 95–136.

      39. Menon T., Morris M., Chiu C., Hong Y. Culture and the Construal of Agency: Attribution to Individual Versus Group Dispositions // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. Yol. 76. № 5. P. 701–717.

      40. Morgan 67. Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1980. Vol. 25. № 4. P. 605–622.

      41. Morris M., Menon /., Ames D. Culturally Conferred Conceptions of Agency: A Key to Social Perception of Persons, Groups, and Other Actors // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2001. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 169–182.

      42. O’Laughlin M.J., Malle B.F. How People Explain Actions Performed by Groups and Individuals // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Yol. 82. № 1. P. 33–48.

      43. Parsons T. Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-1 // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1956. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 63–85.

      44. Perner J. Developing Semantics for Theories of Mind: From Propositional Attitudes to Mental Representation // Developing Theories of Mind / Ed. by J.W. Astington, PL. Harris, D.R. Olson. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988. P. 141–172.

      45. Premack D., Woodruff 67. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1978. Yol. 1. Issue 4. P. 515–526.

      46. Sacchi

Скачать книгу