Score
97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Health Policy and Technology activities?
<--- Score
98. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
99. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
100. Will team members regularly document their Health Policy and Technology work?
<--- Score
101. When is/was the Health Policy and Technology start date?
<--- Score
102. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
103. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
104. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
105. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
106. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
107. Is special Health Policy and Technology user knowledge required?
<--- Score
108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
109. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
110. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
111. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
112. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
113. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
114. How do you think the partners involved in Health Policy and Technology would have defined success?
<--- Score
115. Who approved the Health Policy and Technology scope?
<--- Score
116. How do you hand over Health Policy and Technology context?
<--- Score
117. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
118. Are accountability and ownership for Health Policy and Technology clearly defined?
<--- Score
119. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
120. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health Policy and Technology work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
121. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
122. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
123. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
124. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
125. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
126. What gets examined?
<--- Score
127. Why are you doing Health Policy and Technology and what is the scope?
<--- Score
128. What is the scope of the Health Policy and Technology effort?
<--- Score
129. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
130. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
131. Are the Health Policy and Technology requirements testable?
<--- Score
132. How does the Health Policy and Technology manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
133. Is there any additional Health Policy and Technology definition of success?
<--- Score
134. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
135. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
136. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
137. What are the core elements of the Health Policy and Technology business case?
<--- Score
138. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
139. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided
